-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
rustdoc: Fix ICE for intra-doc link on intermediate re-export #109330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bors
merged 4 commits into
rust-lang:master
from
GuillaumeGomez:intermediate-reexport-intra-doc-ice
Mar 27, 2023
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1dad788
Fix ICE for intra-doc link on intermediate re-export
GuillaumeGomez c8c342c
Add regression test for #109282
GuillaumeGomez de61a78
Use Cow to reduce numbers of memory clone
GuillaumeGomez 87ea994
Remove `span` method from AttributesExt trait
GuillaumeGomez File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109282>. | ||
// Import for `ValueEnum` is inlined and doc comments on the import and `ValueEnum` itself are | ||
// merged. After the merge they still have correct parent scopes to resolve both `[ValueEnum]`. | ||
|
||
// check-pass | ||
|
||
mod m { | ||
pub enum ValueEnum {} | ||
} | ||
mod m2 { | ||
/// [`ValueEnum`] | ||
pub use crate::m::ValueEnum; | ||
} | ||
pub use m2::ValueEnum; |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@GuillaumeGomez
This PR wasn't rebased correctly, after #109312 doc fragment contain ids of imports themselves, not their parent modules.
This is most likely the reason why this PR doesn't fix the
rustix
issues it was supposed to fix.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fixed this during rebase of #109500.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh. It's surprising that the test I added was still working then. Well, great that your PR fixed it.