Update windows ffi bindings

[ChrisDenton]

Bump windows-bindgen to version 0.51.1. This brings with it some changes to the generated FFI bindings, but little that affects the code.

One change that does have more of an impact is SOCKET being usize instead of either u64 or u32 (as is used in std's public SOCKET type). However, it's now easy enough to abstract over that difference.

Finally I added a few new bindings that are likely to be used in pending PRs, mostly to make sure they're ok with the new metadata.

r? libs

[kennykerr]

windows-bindgen v0.51.1 has been published.

[rustbot]

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

[ChrisDenton]

I've rebased this PR on the newly released version of windows-bindgen so it should now be ready for review. I've also updated the OP to reflect this PRs current status. There have been a lot of behind the scenes changes to the way windows-bindgen works but kennykerr has endeavoured to make the update relatively seamless for our purposes.

[dtolnay]

Thank you!

[dtolnay]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit e790860 has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e790860 with merge dd91aba...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dtolnay
Pushing dd91aba to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (dd91aba): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.3%, 0.3%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.3%	[-1.3%, -1.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 630.425s -> 631.736s (0.21%)
Artifact size: 317.28 MiB -> 317.32 MiB (0.01%)