Skip to content

Portable SIMD subtree update #121269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 30 commits into from
Feb 19, 2024

Conversation

calebzulawski
Copy link
Member

Syncs nightly to the latest changes from rust-lang/portable-simd

r? @rust-lang/libs

Also, fixes #119904 which is now fixed upstream.

RalfJung and others added 30 commits December 3, 2023 16:02
…atch-1

Fix load/store safety comments to require aligned `T`
This allows miri to detect when they are not, and
may be exploited by LLVM during optimization.
…ass-out-of-u-and-me"

This reverts commit 6ad779c, reversing
changes made to b2e1bcb.
…make-an-ass-out-of-u-and-me""

This reverts commit 644bdfb.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 18, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 18, 2024

Portable SIMD is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/portable-simd instead.

cc @calebzulawski, @programmerjake

@calebzulawski
Copy link
Member Author

Never had a subtree update pass first try. Ready to go!

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Is there a reason you r'd libs on this instead of self-approving? Typically subtree updates aren't actually reviewed on rust-lang/rust; they're unwieldy to do any real review with.

@bors delegate+ r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 18, 2024

✌️ @calebzulawski, you can now approve this pull request!

If @Mark-Simulacrum told you to "r=me" after making some further change, please make that change, then do @bors r=@Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 18, 2024

📌 Commit b2691ba has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 18, 2024
@calebzulawski
Copy link
Member Author

calebzulawski commented Feb 18, 2024

I don't have commit permissions :) Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 19, 2024

⌛ Testing commit b2691ba with merge d573564...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 19, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing d573564 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 19, 2024
@bors bors merged commit d573564 into rust-lang:master Feb 19, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 19, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (d573564): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.4% [-0.4%, -0.4%] 1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-4.0% [-4.0%, -4.0%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-5.0% [-5.0%, -5.0%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -4.0% [-4.0%, -4.0%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.2%, 3.0%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1

Bootstrap: 640.336s -> 640.888s (0.09%)
Artifact size: 308.82 MiB -> 308.82 MiB (0.00%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

portable-simd's swizzle_dyn miscompiles on x86-64
10 participants