Skip to content

Reduce the amount of explicit FatalError.raise() #134561

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

bjorn3
Copy link
Member

@bjorn3 bjorn3 commented Dec 20, 2024

Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't silently abort.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 20, 2024

r? @fee1-dead

rustbot has assigned @fee1-dead.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 20, 2024
Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These
guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't
silently abort.
@bjorn3 bjorn3 force-pushed the less_fatal_error_raise branch from 03ef0e8 to 701e2f7 Compare December 20, 2024 14:09
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2024

📌 Commit 701e2f7 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 20, 2024
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
…ompiler-errors

Reduce the amount of explicit FatalError.raise()

Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't silently abort.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#134556 ([tiny] fix missing ns units in bootstrap's benchmark rendering)
 - rust-lang#134560 (mri: add track_caller to thread spawning methods for better backtraces)
 - rust-lang#134561 (Reduce the amount of explicit FatalError.raise())
 - rust-lang#134562 (tests/codegen/asm: Remove uses of rustc_attrs and lang_items features by using minicore)
 - rust-lang#134567 (Remove some dead code around import library generation)
 - rust-lang#134570 (remove reference to dangling from slice::Iter)
 - rust-lang#134573 (unimplement `PointerLike` for trait objects)
 - rust-lang#134574 (next-solver: disable unnecessary hack)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 4a792fd into rust-lang:master Dec 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 20, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134561 - bjorn3:less_fatal_error_raise, r=compiler-errors

Reduce the amount of explicit FatalError.raise()

Instead use dcx.abort_if_error() or guar.raise_fatal() instead. These guarantee that an error actually happened previously and thus we don't silently abort.
@bjorn3 bjorn3 deleted the less_fatal_error_raise branch December 21, 2024 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants