Skip to content

removed usage of struct_variant feature as it is no longer gated #19122

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2014

Conversation

Kintaro
Copy link
Contributor

@Kintaro Kintaro commented Nov 19, 2014

The struct_variant is not gated anymore. This commit just removes it and the resulting warnings when compiling rust. Now compiles with the snapshot from 11/18 (as opposed to PR #19014)

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2014
The struct_variant is not gated anymore. This commit just removes it and the resulting warnings when compiling rust. Now compiles with the snapshot from 11/18 (as opposed to PR #19014)
@bors bors closed this Nov 22, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 4a83726 into rust-lang:master Nov 22, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2015
…ture, r=sanxiyn

The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See #19122, #19124

§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
dlrobertson pushed a commit to dlrobertson/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
The struct_variant feature was accepted and is no longer feature gated.
See rust-lang#19122, rust-lang#19124

§6.1.6 Enumerations shows an example of a struct-like enum variant.
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants