Skip to content

Remove error about obsolete dereferencing of newtype structs. #25523

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2015

Conversation

nham
Copy link
Contributor

@nham nham commented May 17, 2015

A built-in feature enabling the dereferencing of newtype structs was removed
in PR #11188, and this error (E0068) was added at the same time to warn of
its removal. It seems to make sense to remove the error now, given that
the obsolete feature it is warning about was removed nearly a year and a
half ago.

A built-in feature enabling the dereferencing of newtype structs was removed
in PR rust-lang#11188, and this error (E0068) was added at the same time to warn of
its removal. It seems to make sense to remove the error now, given that
the obsolete feature it is warning about was removed nearly a year and a
half ago.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ f47cb0e

Thanks!

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2015
A built-in feature enabling the dereferencing of newtype structs was removed
in PR #11188, and this error (E0068) was added at the same time to warn of
its removal. It seems to make sense to remove the error now, given that
the obsolete feature it is warning about was removed nearly a year and a
half ago.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 17, 2015

⌛ Testing commit f47cb0e with merge e4d56b7...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 17, 2015

@bors bors merged commit f47cb0e into rust-lang:master May 17, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants