Skip to content

Handle gateage of built-in attributes seperately #28077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2015
Merged

Handle gateage of built-in attributes seperately #28077

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2015

Conversation

jonas-schievink
Copy link
Contributor

This allows marking attributes as whitelisted/crate-only independent of
their feature gate status.

Closes #24213

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

This allows marking attributes as whitelisted/crate-only independent of
their feature gate status.

Closes #24213
("link_section", Whitelisted, Ungated),
("no_builtins", Whitelisted, Ungated),
("no_mangle", Whitelisted, Ungated),
("no_debug", Whitelisted, Ungated),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm, not related to the patch, but I wonder if some of these debug things should be gated... (Edit: opened #28091.)

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Aug 29, 2015

@bors r+

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 29, 2015

📌 Commit 4b571b0 has been approved by huonw

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 29, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 4b571b0 with merge 9982314...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2015
This allows marking attributes as whitelisted/crate-only independent of
their feature gate status.

Closes #24213
@bors bors merged commit 4b571b0 into rust-lang:master Aug 29, 2015
@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink deleted the attr-gateage branch August 30, 2015 00:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants