Small syntax and formatting changes

[id4ho]

No description provided.

[rust-highfive]

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[Manishearth]

@bors r+ rollup

Thanks!

[bors]

📌 Commit 5c5cca5 has been approved by Manishearth

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 5c5cca5 with merge 06748f2...

[bors]

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-nopt-t

[Manishearth]

@bors r+ rollup

Er, what. That's a deterministic failure, but it can't possibly be triggered by this PR. O.o

---- [pretty] run-pass/std-sync-right-kind-impls.rs stdout ----

error: pretty-printed source does not typecheck
status: signal: 11
command: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage2/bin/rustc - -Zno-trans --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -L x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-pass/ -L x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/test/run-pass/std-sync-right-kind-impls.stage2-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.pretty.libaux --cfg rtopt -L x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/rt
stdout:
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------
stderr:
------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------

thread '[pretty] run-pass/std-sync-right-kind-impls.rs' panicked at 'explicit panic', /home/ubuntu/src/rust-buildbot/slave/auto-linux-64-nopt-t/build/src/compiletest/runtest.rs:1501

@alexcrichton I've been seeing some intermittents which are "deterministic" failures (should not be intermittent, should always pass or fail). This is the third case I've seen -- know anything about this? We might want to poke at this more, it's causing completely random failures.

[bors]

📌 Commit 5c5cca5 has been approved by Manishearth

[alexcrichton]

Yes those happen from time to time, I've never been able to track down why