Skip to content

save-analysis: polishing paths #39286

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2017
Merged

save-analysis: polishing paths #39286

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2017

Conversation

nrc
Copy link
Member

@nrc nrc commented Jan 25, 2017

a couple of minor changes that get us better coverage of different paths.

r? @eddyb

nrc added 2 commits January 25, 2017 16:46
This is actually kinda hard to hit, but it fixes missing the `foo` in `for _ in foo {}`.
Catches generic types in paths
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Jan 25, 2017

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

📌 Commit 5e33c5f has been approved by eddyb

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 5e33c5f with merge 1283c02...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2017
save-analysis: polishing paths

a couple of minor changes that get us better coverage of different paths.

r? @eddyb
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 25, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: eddyb
Pushing 1283c02 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 5e33c5f into rust-lang:master Jan 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants