Skip to content

Prettify rustc_session with recent conveniences #95296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 26, 2022

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

No functional changes.

I felt like making something beautiful.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 25, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @cjgillot

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 25, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2022

📌 Commit fd2448b has been approved by Dylan-DPC

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 26, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2022

⌛ Testing commit fd2448b with merge 2882c20...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 2882c20 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 26, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 2882c20 into rust-lang:master Mar 26, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 26, 2022
@workingjubilee workingjubilee deleted the pretty-session branch March 26, 2022 19:51
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (2882c20): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 1 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants