Skip to content

Coding conventions chapter cleaning #2333

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

tshepang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good. Can you please squash the commits into one? r=me after

@jieyouxu jieyouxu changed the title Coding convetions chapter cleaning Coding conventions chapter cleaning Apr 13, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu added S-waiting-on-author Status: this PR is waiting for additional action by the OP WG-rustc-dev-guide Working group: rustc-dev-guide labels Apr 13, 2025
- use correct code block markers
- add missing title
- rustfmt can now use edition setting in its config
  ... and this is set in Rust repo
- reduce visual noise
- needless repetition
- convention is to start sentence with upper case
- sembr
- whitespace
- semi-heading not adding much value
- fix grammar
@tshepang tshepang force-pushed the convetions-chapt-cleaning branch from f73ed31 to 07d3c69 Compare April 14, 2025 06:42
@tshepang tshepang enabled auto-merge April 14, 2025 06:43
@tshepang tshepang merged commit 85c7964 into master Apr 14, 2025
1 check passed
@tshepang tshepang deleted the convetions-chapt-cleaning branch April 14, 2025 06:43
@tshepang
Copy link
Member Author

I separated those since each change could be its own pr, and so one could easily see in history why each change was made. Squashing loses that information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: this PR is waiting for additional action by the OP WG-rustc-dev-guide Working group: rustc-dev-guide
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants