Skip to content

Announcing Scala.js 1.19.0. #654

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2025
Merged

Announcing Scala.js 1.19.0. #654

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2025

Conversation

sjrd
Copy link
Member

@sjrd sjrd commented Apr 20, 2025

No description provided.

@sjrd sjrd requested a review from gzm0 April 20, 2025 18:53
@sjrd sjrd force-pushed the scalajs-1.19.0 branch 2 times, most recently from d762e6d to ef66153 Compare April 21, 2025 09:49
Copy link
Contributor

@gzm0 gzm0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also deprecated ES 5.1 in this version, didn't we?

If that setting is used through an indirect dependency, it will be silently ignored.

Strict floats are almost entirely backward compatible with non-strict floats.
The latter were mostly specified on a best-effort basis, which strict floats comply with.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel this sentence is hard to understand. How about something like:

In general, strict floats mandate behavior which non-strict floats leave unspecified (so non strict floats were always permitted to behave like strict floats).


`js.async { ... }` executes a block of code under a JavaScript `async` context.
The block of code can await `js.Promise`s using `js.await`.
Doing so will continue after the call to `js.await` when the given `Promise` is resolved.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will continue execution ?

Copy link
Member Author

@sjrd sjrd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We also deprecated ES 5.1 in this version, didn't we?

Ah yes. I added a section about that.

@sjrd sjrd requested a review from gzm0 April 21, 2025 14:26
@sjrd sjrd merged commit 197e0a8 into scala-js:main Apr 21, 2025
1 check passed
@sjrd sjrd deleted the scalajs-1.19.0 branch April 21, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants