Skip to content

Fix #222 - Basic raw implementation for DSL 1.0.0 #224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 25, 2025

Conversation

ricardozanini
Copy link
Member

@ricardozanini ricardozanini commented Jan 24, 2025

Many thanks for submitting your Pull Request ❤️!

What this PR does / why we need it:
Fix #222

Special notes for reviewers:

Additional information (if needed):

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation 📓 Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 13, 2025
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@ricardozanini ricardozanini marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2025 22:30
@ricardozanini ricardozanini requested a review from spolti March 13, 2025 22:30
@ricardozanini ricardozanini changed the title Fix #222 - (WIP): Basic raw implementation for DSL 1.0.0 Fix #222 - Basic raw implementation for DSL 1.0.0 Mar 13, 2025
@ricardozanini ricardozanini requested a review from fjtirado March 24, 2025 16:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@fjtirado fjtirado left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Astonishing work @ricardozanini
Congrats!

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Zanini <[email protected]>
@ricardozanini ricardozanini merged commit 15e2f10 into serverlessworkflow:main Mar 25, 2025
4 checks passed
@ricardozanini ricardozanini deleted the issue-222 branch March 25, 2025 13:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📓 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement a simple data flow and JQ expression processing
3 participants