Skip to content

Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections #2794

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections #2794

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

grubeninspekteur
Copy link
Contributor

@grubeninspekteur grubeninspekteur commented Mar 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Closes #2793

  • You have read the Spring Data contribution guidelines.
  • You use the code formatters provided here and have them applied to your changes. Don’t submit any formatting related changes.
  • You submit test cases (unit or integration tests) that back your changes.
  • You added yourself as author in the headers of the classes you touched. Amend the date range in the Apache license header if needed. For new types, add the license header (copy from another file and set the current year only).

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Mar 19, 2023
@mp911de mp911de changed the title Recommend records instead of Lombok for class based projections Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections Mar 20, 2023
@mp911de mp911de self-assigned this Mar 20, 2023
@mp911de mp911de added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Mar 20, 2023
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
@grubeninspekteur @mp911de
Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections.
02ed197 
Closes #2793
Original pull request: #2794
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
@mp911de
Polishing.
5d293c4 
Tweak wording.

See #2794
Original pull request: #2794
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
@grubeninspekteur @mp911de
Recommend Java records instead of Lombok for class-based projections.
959bde4 
Closes #2793
Original pull request: #2794
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
@mp911de
Polishing.
02ce74f 
Tweak wording.

See #2794
Original pull request: #2794
@mp911de
Copy link
Member

mp911de commented Mar 20, 2023

Thank you for your contribution. That's merged, polished, and backported now.

@mp911de mp911de closed this Mar 20, 2023
@grubeninspekteur grubeninspekteur deleted the G-2793_doc_DTO_Projection_records branch March 20, 2023 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@mp911de mp911de

Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Recommend Java Records instead of Lombok for class-based projections
3 participants
@grubeninspekteur @mp911de @spring-projects-issues