Skip to content

Y_Update PlaceholderParser.java #34021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

abdelmawla56
Copy link

i have solved the NestedPlaceholderPart does not recursively resolve placeholders #34020 issue

i have solved the NestedPlaceholderPart does not recursively resolve placeholders spring-projects#34020 issue
@pivotal-cla
Copy link

@abdelmawla56 Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!

Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.

See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Dec 4, 2024
@abdelmawla56
Copy link
Author

hello @vip-delete @spring-projects i have solved the issue please allow me to edit the file

Copy link
Member

@snicoll snicoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for he PR

i have solved the issue please allow me to edit the file

I am not sure what you're asking.

Can you please review the note and add a unit test that shows the use case described in the issue? You also need to sign the CLA.

@@ -443,34 +443,30 @@ record SimplePlaceholderPart(String text, String key, @Nullable String fallback)

@Override
public String resolve(PartResolutionContext resolutionContext) {
String resolvedValue = resolveToText(resolutionContext, this.key);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please revert all the formatting change as it makes it harder for us to see what you've changed.

@snicoll snicoll added the status: waiting-for-feedback We need additional information before we can continue label Dec 4, 2024
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Dec 5, 2024

Looking at the code I am not sure what that meant to accomplish. If you want to contribute, please create a proper branch so that you can work in your IDE and add some tests. I've taken over, see #34020

@snicoll snicoll closed this Dec 5, 2024
@snicoll snicoll added status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply and removed status: waiting-for-feedback We need additional information before we can continue status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: declined A suggestion or change that we don't feel we should currently apply
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants