Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - RBAC naming helper methods #581

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

maltesander
Copy link
Member

Description

  • added cluster resource job impl (airflow, superset)
  • added RBAC naming helper methods

Review Checklist

  • Code contains useful comments
  • (Integration-)Test cases added (or not applicable)
  • Documentation added (or not applicable)
  • Changelog updated (or not applicable)
  • Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)

Once the review is done, comment bors r+ (or bors merge) to merge. Further information

@maltesander maltesander requested review from razvan and adwk67 April 11, 2023 12:35
@maltesander maltesander self-assigned this Apr 11, 2023
@maltesander maltesander marked this pull request as ready for review April 11, 2023 14:00
@maltesander
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

@maltesander
Copy link
Member Author

bors cancel

@maltesander
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2023
## Description

- added cluster resource job impl (airflow, superset)
- added RBAC naming helper methods



Co-authored-by: Malte Sander <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Apr 11, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into main.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title RBAC naming helper methods [Merged by Bors] - RBAC naming helper methods Apr 11, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Apr 11, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the fix-rbac-names branch April 11, 2023 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants