Skip to content

feat: add lapack/base/dtrti2 #2754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Pranavchiku
Copy link
Member

@Pranavchiku Pranavchiku commented Aug 6, 2024

Towards #2464.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request adds JS implementation for lapack/base/dtrti2

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

NA

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

  • Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.
  • refactor base implementation ( possible optimisations )

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@Pranavchiku Pranavchiku added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Base Issue or pull requests related to "low-level" functionality oriented toward library consumers. JavaScript Issue involves or relates to JavaScript. LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). labels Aug 6, 2024
@Pranavchiku
Copy link
Member Author

The latest commit considers row-major upper === column-major lower, etc.

@Pranavchiku Pranavchiku marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2024 15:58
if ( upper ) {
for ( j = 0; j < N; j++ ) {
if ( nounit ) {
A[ offsetA + ( j * strideA1 ) + ( j * strideA2 ) ] = 1.0 / A[ offsetA + ( j * strideA1 ) + ( j * strideA2 ) ];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor to reduce flops.

}
});

tape( 'the function correctly computes inverse of upper triangular non-unit matrix ( row-major )', function test( t ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
tape( 'the function correctly computes inverse of upper triangular non-unit matrix ( row-major )', function test( t ) {
tape( 'the function correctly computes inverse of upper triangular non-unit matrix (row-major)', function test( t ) {

Remove spaces here and in other test descriptions.

t.end();
});

tape( 'the function correctly computes inverse of lower triangular non-unit rectangular matrix ( row-major )', function test( t ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In your descriptions, parameterize to help distinguish. For example, row-major, lower, non-unit. Applies here and elsewhere.

}
});

tape( 'the function supports accessing elements from non-contiguous alignment of row and column ( row-major )', function test( t ) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor to include more systematic tests. Test to the interface, not the implementation.

@kgryte kgryte added the Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged. label Sep 17, 2024
@aman-095
Copy link
Member

/stdlib merge

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Jan 14, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Jan 14, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
lapack/base/dtrti2 $\color{green}343/343$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}32/32$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}343/343$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 14, 2025

/stdlib update-copyright-years

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Jan 14, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label Jan 14, 2025

The function has the following parameters:

- **order**: storage layout.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Base Issue or pull requests related to "low-level" functionality oriented toward library consumers. Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. JavaScript Issue involves or relates to JavaScript. LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). Needs Changes Pull request which needs changes before being merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants