Skip to content

feat: add math/base/special/tribonaccif #6066

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jun 5, 2025
Merged

feat: add math/base/special/tribonaccif #6066

merged 15 commits into from
Jun 5, 2025

Conversation

Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 commented Mar 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Progresses #649.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds math/base/special/tribonaccif which is the single-precision version of tribonacci

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. label Mar 15, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Mar 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
math/base/special/tribonaccif $\color{green}224/224$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}10/10$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}224/224$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

cc:- @kgryte @Planeshifter LMK what am I missing here!!

@Neerajpathak07 Neerajpathak07 marked this pull request as ready for review March 15, 2025 18:48
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Mar 15, 2025
@Planeshifter Planeshifter added the Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. label Mar 15, 2025
@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

Neerajpathak07 commented Mar 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@Planeshifter Hey could I pls know why the potential Dupliate label was added as this package had not been worked upon and I did specifically add max_nth_safe_tribonacci pkg for float32 to implement tribonaccif, also for other constants/float32 packages?

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Mar 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@Neerajpathak07 Simple, because you consistently use resolves incorrectly. No one of your PR "resolves" or "closes" #649. Instead, you should be using "progresses". Only if your PR actually completely addresses an issue should you be using one of those keywords.

Because you consistently use resolves #649, your PRs are being flagged as potential duplicates.

See also https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests.

@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

@kgryte ahh I see alright then I shall update all the other PR's for this.
Thank you soo much for addressing this.

@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

@kgryte Kindly review this and LMK if I am missing something!!

@kgryte kgryte requested a review from gunjjoshi March 19, 2025 22:57
@kgryte kgryte added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. and removed Potential Duplicate There might be another pull request resolving the same issue. labels Mar 19, 2025
gunjjoshi
gunjjoshi requested changes Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
@gunjjoshi
Copy link
Member

@Neerajpathak07 Looks like this PR is missing benchmark/c/native directory and the files inside it.

@Neerajpathak07
Copy link
Member Author

Neerajpathak07 commented Mar 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@gunjjoshi Let me get back to you with the updated changes!!

@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc self-requested a review May 15, 2025 19:22
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor

/stdlib merge

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label May 15, 2025
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot removed the bot: In Progress Pull request is currently awaiting automation. label May 15, 2025
@anandkaranubc
chore: code review
c450a93 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: passed
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
anandkaranubc
anandkaranubc previously approved these changes May 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte reviewed Jun 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
kgryte
kgryte approved these changes Jun 5, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kgryte kgryte removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Jun 5, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 6724610 into stdlib-js:develop Jun 5, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc anandkaranubc left review comments

@kgryte kgryte kgryte approved these changes

@gunjjoshi gunjjoshi Awaiting requested review from gunjjoshi

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@Neerajpathak07 @stdlib-bot @kgryte @gunjjoshi @anandkaranubc @Planeshifter