Can we make sub tags

[faizaantrialx]

1. abc
   i. xyz
   a. xyz- api call
   b. ....
   ii. pqr
   a. ....
   b. ....
   2.

[webron]

swagger-ui doesn't support it and there's no plan to add this functionality. You can modify the code to achieve this functionality.

[faizaantrialx]

Thanks Ron

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Ron [email protected] wrote:

Closed #2129 #2129.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#2129 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AH2qazNIKVdvr7SDJh-q-Hs37SDYLwQjks5qKI1xgaJpZM4ISt85
.

[kamil-kielczewski]

@webron - why?

[webron]

@kamil-kielczewski because it goes beyond what the specification defines.

[kamil-kielczewski]

@webron - yes you have right, how ever it is very practical feature (especially for large APIs) and may be "incorporated" into to specification in future (here I put my proposal ) . How ever my proposition (i think) will be simpler than @faizaantrialx : we can use following convention in tags names (using dots to nesting subtags):

users.client     # and use this tag to client GET/POST/...
users.seller     # and use this tag to seller GET/POST/...
users.admin      # and use this tag to admin GET/POST/...
books            # use this to general books GET/POST...
books.sell       # use this to GET/POST... associated with the sell
books.management # use this to GET/POST... associated with the books management

And in output web-page we will get:

user >
       client >
GET
POST
...
       seller >
GET
POST
...
       admin >
GET
POST
...

books >
GET
POST
...
       sell >
GET
POST
...
       management >
GET
POST
...

If you give me some tips where Is the code of swagger-ux wich generate view I can try to implement this feature

[kritika020594]

Is this issue yet not resolved?

How can we get the following sub tagging-

ABC

4.0
..
..
..
4.5
..
..
..

XYZ

3.3
..
..
3.4
..
..

Means an api having different version and is categorized accordingly

[zer0890]

anyone got a solution about this possibility ?