Provide a ServiceGroupConfiguration
initializer without `gracefulSh…
#147
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…utdownSignals` signals
Motivation
When using the
ServiceGroup
in non-top-level setups such as inside aService.run()
method then it is confusing if you are forced to passgracefulShutdownSignals
.Modification
This PR adds a new initializer to
ServiceGroupConfiguration
which takes no arguments.Result
Less confusion when using the service group inside a non-top-level context.