Skip to content

Trim parameter names in SwiftTestingScanner #1209

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Trim parameter names in SwiftTestingScanner #1209

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f89cf51
Trim parameter names in SwiftTestingScanner
plemarquand Apr 30, 2024
ccabf7a
Use .text over .trimmed
plemarquand Apr 30, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Sources/SourceKitLSP/Swift/SwiftTestingScanner.swift
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ final class SyntacticSwiftTestingTestScanner: SyntaxVisitor {
}

let name =
node.name.text + "(" + node.signature.parameterClause.parameters.map { "\($0.firstName):" }.joined() + ")"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So, this is still not quite correct because of optional leading/trailing backticks. See swiftlang/swift-syntax#1936.

swift-testing has logic to trim these off that you may need to adopt.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@plemarquand plemarquand Apr 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like the best course of action is to leverage swiftlang/swift-syntax#2576 when its ready. @ahoppen In the short term is it worth stripping the backticks in the TestItem initializer until the proper solution is merged?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Long-term yes, short-term we'll need you to remove them manually I think. (Whether or not it's "worth it" is subjective, but swift-testing's own test suite checks for this sort of thing.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ahoppen @grynspan I think its worth merging this on its own and addressing the backticks in a follow up.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine—let's just not forget.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created #1211 as a stopgap until swiftlang/swift-syntax#2576 is ready

node.name.text + "(" + node.signature.parameterClause.parameters.map { "\($0.firstName.text):" }.joined() + ")"

let range = snapshot.range(of: node.positionAfterSkippingLeadingTrivia..<node.endPositionBeforeTrailingTrivia)
let testItem = TestItem(
Expand Down
90 changes: 90 additions & 0 deletions Tests/SourceKitLSPTests/DocumentTestDiscoveryTests.swift
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -386,6 +386,96 @@ final class DocumentTestDiscoveryTests: XCTestCase {
)
}

func testParameterizedSwiftTestingTestWithAnonymousArgument() async throws {
let testClient = try await TestSourceKitLSPClient()
let uri = DocumentURI.for(.swift)

let positions = testClient.openDocument(
"""
import Testing

1️⃣struct MyTests {
2️⃣@Test(arguments: [0, 1, 2])
func numbersAreOne(_ x: Int) {
#expect(x == 1)
}3️⃣
}4️⃣
""",
uri: uri
)

let tests = try await testClient.send(DocumentTestsRequest(textDocument: TextDocumentIdentifier(uri)))
XCTAssertEqual(
tests,
[
TestItem(
id: "MyTests",
label: "MyTests",
disabled: false,
style: TestStyle.swiftTesting,
location: Location(uri: uri, range: positions["1️⃣"]..<positions["4️⃣"]),
children: [
TestItem(
id: "MyTests/numbersAreOne(_:)",
label: "numbersAreOne(_:)",
disabled: false,
style: TestStyle.swiftTesting,
location: Location(uri: uri, range: positions["2️⃣"]..<positions["3️⃣"]),
children: [],
tags: []
)
],
tags: []
)
]
)
}

func testParameterizedSwiftTestingTestWithCommentInSignature() async throws {
let testClient = try await TestSourceKitLSPClient()
let uri = DocumentURI.for(.swift)

let positions = testClient.openDocument(
"""
import Testing

1️⃣struct MyTests {
2️⃣@Test(arguments: [0, 1, 2])
func numbersAreOne(x /* hello */: Int) {
#expect(x == 1)
}3️⃣
}4️⃣
""",
uri: uri
)

let tests = try await testClient.send(DocumentTestsRequest(textDocument: TextDocumentIdentifier(uri)))
XCTAssertEqual(
tests,
[
TestItem(
id: "MyTests",
label: "MyTests",
disabled: false,
style: TestStyle.swiftTesting,
location: Location(uri: uri, range: positions["1️⃣"]..<positions["4️⃣"]),
children: [
TestItem(
id: "MyTests/numbersAreOne(x:)",
label: "numbersAreOne(x:)",
disabled: false,
style: TestStyle.swiftTesting,
location: Location(uri: uri, range: positions["2️⃣"]..<positions["3️⃣"]),
children: [],
tags: []
)
],
tags: []
)
]
)
}

func testSwiftTestingSuiteWithNoTests() async throws {
let testClient = try await TestSourceKitLSPClient()
let uri = DocumentURI.for(.swift)
Expand Down