-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
Ignore sentence terminators inside quotes when applying the 'BeginDocumentationCommentWithOneLineSummary' option. #687
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
allevato
merged 3 commits into
swiftlang:main
from
TTOzzi:fix-BeginDocumentationCommentWithOneLineSummary
Feb 4, 2024
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -139,4 +139,24 @@ final class BeginDocumentationCommentWithOneLineSummaryTests: LintOrFormatRuleTe | |
) | ||
#endif | ||
} | ||
|
||
func testSentenceTerminationInsideQuotes() { | ||
assertLint( | ||
BeginDocumentationCommentWithOneLineSummary.self, | ||
""" | ||
/// Creates an instance with the same raw value as `x` failing iff `x.kind != Subject.kind`. | ||
struct TestBackTick {} | ||
|
||
/// A set of `Diagnostic` that can answer the question 'was there an error?' in O(1). | ||
struct TestSingleQuotes {} | ||
|
||
/// A set of `Diagnostic` that can answer the question “was there an error?” in O(1). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Both this example and the one below use smart quotes. Can you add one with regular ASCII (straight) double quotes? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sure, I'll add it! |
||
struct TestDoubleQuotes {} | ||
|
||
/// A set of `Diagnostic` that can answer the question “was there | ||
/// an error?” in O(1). | ||
struct TestTwoLinesDoubleQuotes {} | ||
""" | ||
) | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was going to point out that this won't handle nested quotes correctly, but it looks like the Foundation API itself doesn't categorize them correctly either:
So an attempt to increment/decrement a nested quote count won't work as intended. In other words, I wanted to point it out but you don't need to change anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is entirely dependent on the behavior of the Foundation API.
And since
linguisticTags
is a deprecated API, it's unlikely that we'll see any improvements to it 🤔The replacement,
NaturalLanguage
, works the same aslinguisticTags
, but I've migrated to it in case it's improved in the future.