Add a comment to explain why we don't process code coverage on test fail #7844
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
grynspan
requested review from
bnbarham,
MaxDesiatov,
jakepetroules,
francescomikulis and
xedin
as code owners
|
@swift-ci please test |
…ail. In #6894, code coverage processing was disabled because it produces spurious output. This PR just adds a comment to the current source that links back to that one for future reference.
grynspan
force-pushed
the
jgrynspan/explain-why-code-cov-is-missing-on-failure
branch
from
dd2309d to
e043eb6
Compare
|
@swift-ci please test |
MaxDesiatov
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2024
|
@swift-ci please test Windows |
|
@swift-ci test windows |
grynspan
deleted the
jgrynspan/explain-why-code-cov-is-missing-on-failure
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #6894, code coverage processing was disabled because it produces spurious output. This PR just adds a comment to the current source that links back to that one for future reference.