Fix typo in Package.swift comment
#8146
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There's no such product or entity as "SPM", this contraction is just as invalid as "MOS" would be for macOS, or "SNIO" for SwiftNIO. All marketing and documentation materials consistently refer to it as "SwiftPM", and we should stay consistent in our codebase too. This also simplifies code search, as anything named as "SPM" almost never shows up in results when searching globally for "SwiftPM".
MaxDesiatov
requested review from
bnbarham,
jakepetroules,
francescomikulis,
xedin,
dschaefer2,
shawnhyam,
bripeticca,
plemarquand and
owenv
as code owners
|
@swift-ci test |
plemarquand
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
bkhouri
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2024
jakepetroules
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's no such product or entity as "SPM", this contraction is just as invalid as "MOS" would be for macOS, or "SNIO" for SwiftNIO. All marketing and documentation materials consistently refer to it as "SwiftPM", and we should stay consistent in our codebase too. This also simplifies code search, as anything named as "SPM" almost never shows up in results when searching globally for "SwiftPM".