[6.0] Add isolation argument to functions taking non-sendable async closures.

Sources/Testing/Expectations/ExpectationChecking+Macro.swift

@@ -835,10 +835,11 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
 ///   `#require()` macros. Do not call it directly.
 public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
   throws errorType: E.Type,
-  performing body: () async throws -> some Any,
+  performing body: () async throws -> sending some Any,
   expression: __Expression,
   comments: @autoclosure () -> [Comment],
   isRequired: Bool,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation
 ) async -> Result<Void, any Error> where E: Error {
   if errorType == Never.self {
@@ -848,6 +849,7 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
       expression: expression,
       comments: comments(),
       isRequired: isRequired,
+      isolation: isolation,
       sourceLocation: sourceLocation
     )
   } else {
@@ -858,6 +860,7 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
       expression: expression,
       comments: comments(),
       isRequired: isRequired,
+      isolation: isolation,
       sourceLocation: sourceLocation
     )
   }
@@ -911,10 +914,11 @@ public func __checkClosureCall(
 ///   `#require()` macros. Do not call it directly.
 public func __checkClosureCall(
   throws _: Never.Type,
-  performing body: () async throws -> some Any,
+  performing body: () async throws -> sending some Any,
   expression: __Expression,
   comments: @autoclosure () -> [Comment],
   isRequired: Bool,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation
 ) async -> Result<Void, any Error> {
   var success = true
@@ -973,10 +977,11 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
 ///   `#require()` macros. Do not call it directly.
 public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
   throws error: E,
-  performing body: () async throws -> some Any,
+  performing body: () async throws -> sending some Any,
   expression: __Expression,
   comments: @autoclosure () -> [Comment],
   isRequired: Bool,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation
 ) async -> Result<Void, any Error> where E: Error & Equatable {
   await __checkClosureCall(
@@ -986,6 +991,7 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<E>(
     expression: expression,
     comments: comments(),
     isRequired: isRequired,
+    isolation: isolation,
     sourceLocation: sourceLocation
   )
 }
@@ -1047,12 +1053,13 @@ public func __checkClosureCall<R>(
 /// - Warning: This function is used to implement the `#expect()` and
 ///   `#require()` macros. Do not call it directly.
 public func __checkClosureCall<R>(
-  performing body: () async throws -> R,
+  performing body: () async throws -> sending R,
   throws errorMatcher: (any Error) async throws -> Bool,
   mismatchExplanation: ((any Error) -> String)? = nil,
   expression: __Expression,
   comments: @autoclosure () -> [Comment],
   isRequired: Bool,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation
 ) async -> Result<Void, any Error> {
   var errorMatches = false

Sources/Testing/Issues/Confirmation.swift

@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ extension Confirmation {
 ///     `body` is invoked. The default value of this argument is `1`, indicating
 ///     that the event should occur exactly once. Pass `0` if the event should
 ///     _never_ occur when `body` is invoked.
+///   - isolation: The actor to which `body` is isolated, if any.
 ///   - sourceLocation: The source location to which any recorded issues should
 ///     be attributed.
 ///   - body: The function to invoke.
@@ -94,12 +95,14 @@ extension Confirmation {
 public func confirmation<R>(
   _ comment: Comment? = nil,
   expectedCount: Int = 1,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation = #_sourceLocation,
-  _ body: (Confirmation) async throws -> R
+  _ body: (Confirmation) async throws -> sending R
 ) async rethrows -> R {
   try await confirmation(
     comment,
     expectedCount: expectedCount ... expectedCount,
+    isolation: isolation,
     sourceLocation: sourceLocation,
     body
   )
@@ -114,6 +117,7 @@ public func confirmation<R>(
 ///     function.
 ///   - expectedCount: A range of integers indicating the number of times the
 ///   	expected event should occur when `body` is invoked.
+///   - isolation: The actor to which `body` is isolated, if any.
 ///   - sourceLocation: The source location to which any recorded issues should
 ///     be attributed.
 ///   - body: The function to invoke.
@@ -156,13 +160,14 @@ public func confirmation<R>(
 /// preconditions have been met, and records an issue if they have not.
 ///
 /// If an exact count is expected, use
-/// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)-7kfko`` instead.
+/// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)`` instead.
 @_spi(Experimental)
 public func confirmation<R>(
   _ comment: Comment? = nil,
   expectedCount: some Confirmation.ExpectedCount,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation = #_sourceLocation,
-  _ body: (Confirmation) async throws -> R
+  _ body: (Confirmation) async throws -> sending R
 ) async rethrows -> R {
   let confirmation = Confirmation()
   defer {
@@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ public func confirmation<R>(
 @_spi(Experimental)
 extension Confirmation {
   /// A protocol that describes a range expression that can be used with
-  /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)-41gmd``.
+  /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)-9rt6m``.
   ///
   /// This protocol represents any expression that describes a range of
   /// confirmation counts. For example, the expression `1 ..< 10` automatically

Sources/Testing/Issues/Issue+Recording.swift

@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ extension Issue {
   ///   - sourceLocation: The source location to attribute any caught error to.
   ///   - configuration: The test configuration to use when recording an issue.
   ///     The default value is ``Configuration/current``.
+  ///   - isolation: The actor to which `body` is isolated, if any.
   ///   - body: An asynchronous closure that might throw an error.
   ///
   /// - Returns: The issue representing the caught error, if any error was
@@ -204,6 +205,7 @@ extension Issue {
   static func withErrorRecording(
     at sourceLocation: SourceLocation,
     configuration: Configuration? = nil,
+    isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
     _ body: () async throws -> Void
   ) async -> (any Error)? {
     // Ensure that we are capturing backtraces for errors before we start

Sources/Testing/Issues/Issue.swift

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ public struct Issue: Sendable {
     ///     ``Confirmation/confirm(count:)`` should have been called.
     ///
     /// This issue can occur when calling
-    /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)`` when the
+    /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)`` when the
     /// confirmation passed to these functions' `body` closures is confirmed too
     /// few or too many times.
     indirect case confirmationMiscounted(actual: Int, expected: Int)
@@ -48,9 +48,9 @@ public struct Issue: Sendable {
     ///     ``Confirmation/confirm(count:)`` should have been called.
     ///
     /// This issue can occur when calling
-    /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)-41gmd`` when the
-    /// confirmation passed to these functions' `body` closures is confirmed too
-    /// few or too many times.
+    /// ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)-9rt6m`` when
+    /// the confirmation passed to these functions' `body` closures is confirmed
+    /// too few or too many times.
     @_spi(Experimental)
     indirect case confirmationOutOfRange(actual: Int, expected: any Confirmation.ExpectedCount)
 

Sources/Testing/Issues/KnownIssue.swift

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ public typealias KnownIssueMatcher = @Sendable (_ issue: Issue) -> Bool
 /// Because all errors thrown by `body` are caught as known issues, this
 /// function is not throwing. If only some errors or issues are known to occur
 /// while others should continue to cause test failures, use
-/// ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-5vi5n``
+/// ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
 /// instead.
 public func withKnownIssue(
   _ comment: Comment? = nil,
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ public func withKnownIssue(
 ///
 /// It is not necessary to specify both `precondition` and `issueMatcher` if
 /// only one is relevant. If all errors and issues should be considered known
-/// issues, use ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-95r6o``
+/// issues, use ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)``
 /// instead.
 ///
 /// - Note: `issueMatcher` may be invoked more than once for the same issue.
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ public func withKnownIssue(
 ///   - isIntermittent: Whether or not the known issue occurs intermittently. If
 ///     this argument is `true` and the known issue does not occur, no secondary
 ///     issue is recorded.
+///   - isolation: The actor to which `body` is isolated, if any.
 ///   - sourceLocation: The source location to which any recorded issues should
 ///     be attributed.
 ///   - body: The function to invoke.
@@ -218,15 +219,16 @@ public func withKnownIssue(
 /// Because all errors thrown by `body` are caught as known issues, this
 /// function is not throwing. If only some errors or issues are known to occur
 /// while others should continue to cause test failures, use
-/// ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-47y3z``
+/// ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
 /// instead.
 public func withKnownIssue(
   _ comment: Comment? = nil,
   isIntermittent: Bool = false,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation = #_sourceLocation,
   _ body: () async throws -> Void
 ) async {
-  try? await withKnownIssue(comment, isIntermittent: isIntermittent, sourceLocation: sourceLocation, body, matching: { _ in true })
+  try? await withKnownIssue(comment, isIntermittent: isIntermittent, isolation: isolation, sourceLocation: sourceLocation, body, matching: { _ in true })
 }
 
 /// Invoke a function that has a known issue that is expected to occur during
@@ -237,6 +239,7 @@ public func withKnownIssue(
 ///   - isIntermittent: Whether or not the known issue occurs intermittently. If
 ///     this argument is `true` and the known issue does not occur, no secondary
 ///     issue is recorded.
+///   - isolation: The actor to which `body` is isolated, if any.
 ///   - sourceLocation: The source location to which any recorded issues should
 ///     be attributed.
 ///   - body: The function to invoke.
@@ -269,13 +272,14 @@ public func withKnownIssue(
 ///
 /// It is not necessary to specify both `precondition` and `issueMatcher` if
 /// only one is relevant. If all errors and issues should be considered known
-/// issues, use ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-3g6b7``
+/// issues, use ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
 /// instead.
 ///
 /// - Note: `issueMatcher` may be invoked more than once for the same issue.
 public func withKnownIssue(
   _ comment: Comment? = nil,
   isIntermittent: Bool = false,
+  isolation: isolated (any Actor)? = #isolation,
   sourceLocation: SourceLocation = #_sourceLocation,
   _ body: () async throws -> Void,
   when precondition: () async -> Bool = { true },

Sources/Testing/Testing.docc/Expectations.md

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ the test when the code doesn't satisfy a requirement, use
 ### Confirming that asynchronous events occur
 
 - <doc:testing-asynchronous-code>
-- ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)``
+- ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)``
 - ``Confirmation``
 
 ### Retrieving information about checked expectations

Sources/Testing/Testing.docc/MigratingFromXCTest.md

@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ Some tests, especially those that test asynchronously-delivered events, cannot
 be readily converted to use Swift concurrency. The testing library offers
 functionality called _confirmations_ which can be used to implement these tests.
 Instances of ``Confirmation`` are created and used within the scope of the
-function ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)``.
+function ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)``.
 
 Confirmations function similarly to the expectations API of XCTest, however, they don't
 block or suspend the caller while waiting for a condition to be fulfilled.
@@ -531,8 +531,8 @@ to tell XCTest and its infrastructure that the issue shouldn't cause the test
 to fail. The testing library has an equivalent function with synchronous and
 asynchronous variants:
 
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-95r6o``
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-3g6b7``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)``
 
 This function can be used to annotate a section of a test as having a known
 issue:
@@ -627,8 +627,8 @@ Additional options can be specified when calling `XCTExpectFailure()`:
 The testing library includes overloads of `withKnownIssue()` that take
 additional arguments with similar behavior:
 
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-5vi5n``
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-47y3z``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
 
 To conditionally enable known-issue matching or to match only certain kinds
 of issues:

Sources/Testing/Testing.docc/known-issues.md

@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ at runtime not to mark the test as failing when issues occur.
 
 ### Recording known issues in tests
 
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-95r6o``
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)-3g6b7``
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-5vi5n``
-- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)-47y3z``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:)``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
+- ``withKnownIssue(_:isIntermittent:isolation:sourceLocation:_:when:matching:)``
 - ``KnownIssueMatcher``
 
 ### Describing a failure or warning

Sources/Testing/Testing.docc/testing-asynchronous-code.md

@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ expected event happens.
 
 ### Confirm that an event happens
 
-Call ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:sourceLocation:_:)`` in your asynchronous
-test function to create a `Confirmation` for the expected event. In the trailing
-closure parameter, call the code under test. Swift Testing passes a
+Call ``confirmation(_:expectedCount:isolation:sourceLocation:_:)`` in your
+asynchronous test function to create a `Confirmation` for the expected event. In
+the trailing closure parameter, call the code under test. Swift Testing passes a
 `Confirmation` as the parameter to the closure, which you call as a function in
 the event handler for the code under test when the event you're testing for
 occurs:

Sources/TestingMacros/ConditionMacro.swift

@@ -33,14 +33,20 @@ public import SwiftSyntaxMacros
 ///
 /// The `__check()` function that implements expansions of these macros must
 /// take any developer-supplied arguments _before_ the ones inserted during
-/// macro expansion (starting with the `"expression"` argument.)
+/// macro expansion (starting with the `"expression"` argument.) The `isolation`
+/// argument (if present) and `sourceLocation` argument are placed at the end of
+/// the generated function call's argument list.
 public protocol ConditionMacro: ExpressionMacro, Sendable {
   /// Whether or not the macro's expansion may throw an error.
   static var isThrowing: Bool { get }
 }
 
 // MARK: -
 
+/// The token used as the label of the argument passed to `#expect()` and
+/// `#require()` and used for actor isolation.
+private var _isolationLabel: TokenSyntax { .identifier("isolation") }
+
 /// The token used as the label of the source location argument passed to
 /// `#expect()` and `#require()`.
 private var _sourceLocationLabel: TokenSyntax { .identifier("sourceLocation") }
@@ -89,6 +95,9 @@ extension ConditionMacro {
       // never the first argument.)
       commentIndex = macroArguments.dropFirst().lastIndex { $0.label == nil }
     }
+    let isolationArgumentIndex = macroArguments.lazy
+      .compactMap(\.label)
+      .firstIndex { $0.tokenKind == _isolationLabel.tokenKind }
     let sourceLocationArgumentIndex = macroArguments.lazy
       .compactMap(\.label)
       .firstIndex { $0.tokenKind == _sourceLocationLabel.tokenKind }
@@ -103,6 +112,7 @@ extension ConditionMacro {
         // arguments here.
         checkArguments += macroArguments.indices.lazy
           .filter { $0 != commentIndex }
+          .filter { $0 != isolationArgumentIndex }
           .filter { $0 != sourceLocationArgumentIndex }
           .map { macroArguments[$0] }
 
@@ -124,6 +134,7 @@ extension ConditionMacro {
         // "sourceLocation" arguments here.
         checkArguments += macroArguments.dropFirst().indices.lazy
           .filter { $0 != commentIndex }
+          .filter { $0 != isolationArgumentIndex }
           .filter { $0 != sourceLocationArgumentIndex }
           .map { macroArguments[$0] }
 
@@ -160,6 +171,10 @@ extension ConditionMacro {
 
       checkArguments.append(Argument(label: "isRequired", expression: BooleanLiteralExprSyntax(isThrowing)))
 
+      if let isolationArgumentIndex {
+        checkArguments.append(macroArguments[isolationArgumentIndex])
+      }
+
       if let sourceLocationArgumentIndex {
         checkArguments.append(macroArguments[sourceLocationArgumentIndex])
       } else {

Tests/TestingMacrosTests/ConditionMacroTests.swift

@@ -88,6 +88,8 @@ struct ConditionMacroTests {
         ##"Testing.__checkPropertyAccess(a.self, getting: { $0???.isB }, expression: .__fromPropertyAccess(.__fromSyntaxNode("a"), .__fromSyntaxNode("isB")), comments: [], isRequired: false, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__expected()"##,
       ##"#expect(a?.b.isB)"##:
         ##"Testing.__checkPropertyAccess(a?.b.self, getting: { $0?.isB }, expression: .__fromPropertyAccess(.__fromSyntaxNode("a?.b"), .__fromSyntaxNode("isB")), comments: [], isRequired: false, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__expected()"##,
+      ##"#expect(isolation: somewhere) {}"##:
+        ##"Testing.__checkClosureCall(performing: {}, expression: .__fromSyntaxNode("{}"), comments: [], isRequired: false, isolation: somewhere, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__expected()"##,
     ]
   )
   func expectMacro(input: String, expectedOutput: String) throws {
@@ -164,6 +166,8 @@ struct ConditionMacroTests {
         ##"Testing.__checkPropertyAccess(a.self, getting: { $0???.isB }, expression: .__fromPropertyAccess(.__fromSyntaxNode("a"), .__fromSyntaxNode("isB")), comments: [], isRequired: true, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__required()"##,
       ##"#require(a?.b.isB)"##:
         ##"Testing.__checkPropertyAccess(a?.b.self, getting: { $0?.isB }, expression: .__fromPropertyAccess(.__fromSyntaxNode("a?.b"), .__fromSyntaxNode("isB")), comments: [], isRequired: true, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__required()"##,
+      ##"#require(isolation: somewhere) {}"##:
+        ##"Testing.__checkClosureCall(performing: {}, expression: .__fromSyntaxNode("{}"), comments: [], isRequired: true, isolation: somewhere, sourceLocation: Testing.SourceLocation.__here()).__required()"##,
     ]
   )
   func requireMacro(input: String, expectedOutput: String) throws {