Skip to content

build: auto-vendor SwiftSystem when not provided #443

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

When SwiftSystem is not provided to be built against explicitly (i.e.
-D SwiftSystem_DIR=...), vendor a copy of SwiftSystem to allow the
library to be built by including and building its dependencies. This
behaviour is similar to how SPM based builds function.

Swift now requires CMake 3.19.6 as a minimum version.  Assume that we
can use CMake newer than 3.16 and simplify the build rules.
When SwiftSystem is not provided to be built against explicitly (i.e.
`-D SwiftSystem_DIR=...`), vendor a copy of SwiftSystem to allow the
library to be built by including and building its dependencies.  This
behaviour is similar to how SPM based builds function.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@neonichu
Copy link
Contributor

@tomerd can we just cut the swift-system dependency actually? IIRC, it was eagerly added in anticipation of using its path type but we have no plans to actually use that anymore.

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@neonichu hmm, we can for the vendoring path, but the non-vendored path needs it as imports are public still, and TSC has a dependency on System.

@neonichu
Copy link
Contributor

Right, what I mean is that the dependency doesn't actually have any purpose. I opened a PR to remove it: #448

@compnerd compnerd closed this Nov 30, 2023
@compnerd compnerd deleted the vendor branch November 30, 2023 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants