Skip to content

fix typo #142

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix typo #142

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/proposals/WholeModuleOptimization.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ have them ask for the results of an analyses for the entire SCC and
then iterate over all functions in the SCC?**

In some cases we have transforms that generate new work in a top-down
fashion, for example the devirtualizer as well as any pass that
fashion, for example the de-virtualizer as well as any pass that
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"devirtualizer" is a term-of-art. It should be left unhyphenated.

Thank you for suggesting this change, however.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your note!

clones. These can be handled by allowing function passes to push new
work at the top of the stack of work items, and then upon finishing a
pass the pass pipeline will be restarted with those new functions at
Expand Down