Skip to content

[CodeCompletion] Fix an issue that causes an iterator to be invalidated while iterating #66517

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
49 changes: 48 additions & 1 deletion lib/IDE/CompletionLookup.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3214,16 +3214,61 @@ void CompletionLookup::getTypeCompletionsInDeclContext(SourceLoc Loc,
RequestedCachedResults.insert(RequestedResultsTy::topLevelResults(filter));
}

namespace {

/// A \c VisibleDeclConsumer that stores all decls that are found and is able
/// to forward the to another \c VisibleDeclConsumer later.
class StoringDeclConsumer : public VisibleDeclConsumer {
struct FoundDecl {
ValueDecl *VD;
DeclVisibilityKind Reason;
DynamicLookupInfo DynamicLookupInfo;
};

std::vector<FoundDecl> FoundDecls;

void foundDecl(ValueDecl *VD, DeclVisibilityKind Reason,
DynamicLookupInfo DynamicLookupInfo = {}) override {
FoundDecls.push_back({VD, Reason, DynamicLookupInfo});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
FoundDecls.push_back({VD, Reason, DynamicLookupInfo});
FoundDecls.emplace_back(VD, Reason, DynamicLookupInfo);

}

public:
/// Call \c foundDecl for every declaration that this consumer has found.
void forward(VisibleDeclConsumer &Consumer) {
for (auto &FoundDecl : FoundDecls) {
Consumer.foundDecl(FoundDecl.VD, FoundDecl.Reason,
FoundDecl.DynamicLookupInfo);
}
}
};

} // namespace

void CompletionLookup::getToplevelCompletions(CodeCompletionFilter Filter) {
Kind = (Filter - CodeCompletionFilterFlag::Module)
.containsOnly(CodeCompletionFilterFlag::Type)
? LookupKind::TypeInDeclContext
: LookupKind::ValueInDeclContext;
NeedLeadingDot = false;

// If we have 'addinitstotoplevel' enabled, calling `foundDecl` on `this`
// can cause macros to get expanded, which can then cause new members ot get
// added to 'TopLevelValues', invalidating iterator over `TopLevelDecls` in
// `SourceLookupCache::lookupVisibleDecls`.
//
// Technically `foundDecl` should not expand macros or discover new top level
// members in any way because those newly discovered decls will not be added
// to the code completion results. However, it's preferrable to miss results
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// to the code completion results. However, it's preferrable to miss results
// to the code completion results. However, it's preferable to miss results

// than to silently invalidate a collection, resulting in hard-to-diagnose
// crashes.
// Thus, store all the decls found by `CurrModule->lookupVisibleDecls` in a
// vector first and only call `this->foundDecl` once we have left the
// iteration loop over `TopLevelDecls`.
StoringDeclConsumer StoringConsumer;

UsableFilteringDeclConsumer UsableFilteringConsumer(
Ctx.SourceMgr, CurrDeclContext, Ctx.SourceMgr.getIDEInspectionTargetLoc(),
*this);
StoringConsumer);
AccessFilteringDeclConsumer AccessFilteringConsumer(CurrDeclContext,
UsableFilteringConsumer);

Expand All @@ -3242,6 +3287,8 @@ void CompletionLookup::getToplevelCompletions(CodeCompletionFilter Filter) {

CurrModule->lookupVisibleDecls({}, FilteringConsumer,
NLKind::UnqualifiedLookup);

StoringConsumer.forward(*this);
}

void CompletionLookup::lookupExternalModuleDecls(
Expand Down