Enable URL rewriting for PostCSS #16965
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
philipp-spiess
force-pushed
the
fix/vite-postcss-rebase
branch
from
abaa114 to
89671f0
Compare
philipp-spiess
force-pushed
the
fix/vite-postcss-rebase
branch
from
89671f0 to
f8ebd54
Compare
philipp-spiess
force-pushed
the
fix/vite-postcss-rebase
branch
from
eef25ae to
e989430
Compare
thecrypticace
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2025
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jordan Pittman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #16636
This PR enables URL rebasing for PostCSS. Furthermore it fixes an issue where transitive imports rebased against the importer CSS file instead of the input CSS file. While fixing this we noticed that this is also broken in Vite right now and that our integration test swallowed that when testing because it did not import any Tailwind CSS code and thus was not considered a Tailwind file.
Test plan
Added regression integration tests
Also validated it against the repro of @tailwindcss/postcss #16962: