Skip to content

refactor generated code #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022
Merged

refactor generated code #90

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2022

Conversation

tatethurston
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@tatethurston tatethurston force-pushed the tate/refactor-generated-code branch from 61e3758 to fc9f6a9 Compare January 18, 2022 18:48
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #90 (fc9f6a9) into main (6950517) will increase coverage by 0.45%.
The diff coverage is 92.30%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #90      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.67%   83.13%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         935      913      -22     
  Branches      263      256       -7     
==========================================
- Hits          773      759      -14     
+ Misses        162      154       -8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/test-serialization/message.pb.ts 90.38% <90.47%> (+6.31%) ⬆️
src/autogenerate/index.ts 94.73% <100.00%> (-0.38%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6950517...fc9f6a9. Read the comment docs.

@tatethurston tatethurston merged commit 4d1099a into main Jan 18, 2022
@tatethurston tatethurston deleted the tate/refactor-generated-code branch January 18, 2022 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants