fix(prefer-to-have-style): Remove autofix for computed access of el.style

[sjarva]

What:

• remove the autofix and related helper functions in src/rules/prefer-to-have-style.js
• updated relevant test cases in src/rules/__tests__/lib/rules/prefer-to-have-style.js not to have output

Why:

To close #265.

Checklist:

• [] Documentation N/A
• Tests
• Ready to be merged

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #286 (56cb534) into main (48fce31) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #286   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           15        15           
  Lines          581       550   -31     
  Branches       167       155   -12     
=========================================
- Hits           581       550   -31     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/rules/prefer-to-have-style.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[G-Rath]

The autofixes that we're testing are all valid and correct, so we shouldn't be removing it - the issue is when the property is computed, which we don't currently have a test case for

i.e. we want to have this passing

    {
      code: `expect(imageElement.style[computed]).toBe(\`inset 0px 0px 0px 400px ${c}\`)`,
      errors,
      output: null,
    },

[github-actions]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.0.1 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀