Added Sentry example #1435
Added Sentry example #1435
Conversation
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@D-K-P has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 56 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new documentation file titled "Track errors with Sentry," which guides users on integrating Sentry error tracking with Trigger.dev. It includes prerequisites, configuration examples, and testing instructions. Additionally, a new task for testing Sentry integration is added. The introduction document is updated to reference this new guide, and the documentation structure in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/guides/examples/sentry-error-tracking.mdx (5)
7-10: Enhance the overview section with more context.Consider expanding the overview to include:
- A brief explanation of what Sentry is
- The benefits of error tracking
- Why someone would want to integrate Sentry with Trigger.dev
Example enhancement:
## Overview -Automatically send errors to your Sentry project from your Trigger.dev tasks. +[Sentry](https://sentry.io) is an error monitoring and performance tracking platform that helps developers identify and fix issues in real-time. By integrating Sentry with your Trigger.dev tasks, you can: + +- Automatically capture and track errors in your tasks +- Get detailed error reports with stack traces and context +- Monitor task performance and reliability +- Receive instant notifications when issues occur
11-15: Add additional prerequisites for clarity.Consider adding these important prerequisites:
- Required Sentry permissions/roles for creating auth tokens
- Node.js/runtime environment requirements
- Basic familiarity with Trigger.dev tasks
40-42: Explain the project ref placeholder.The
<project ref>placeholder needs explanation on where to find this value.Add a note explaining that the project ref can be found in the Trigger.dev dashboard project settings.
128-132: Add troubleshooting guide and expected results.The testing instructions should include:
- Screenshots of the expected Sentry dashboard view
- Common troubleshooting steps
- Verification steps to ensure the integration is working
16-19: Add security considerations section.Consider adding a section about security best practices:
- Proper handling of Sentry DSN and auth tokens
- Data privacy considerations
- Rate limiting and quotas
- Environment-specific configurations
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- docs/guides/examples/sentry-error-tracking.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/guides/introduction.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/mint.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/guides/introduction.mdx (1)
50-50: LGTM! Well-structured documentation addition.The new Sentry example task entry is well-integrated into the documentation:
- Follows consistent formatting
- Maintains alphabetical ordering
- Provides clear and concise description
- Uses correct link structure
docs/mint.json (1)
314-314: LGTM! Documentation navigation entry is properly structured.The new Sentry error tracking guide is correctly added to the "Example tasks" section, maintaining alphabetical order and consistent formatting with other entries.
| init: async () => { | ||
| Sentry.init({ | ||
| // The Data Source Name (DSN) is a unique identifier for your Sentry project. | ||
|
|
||
| dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN, | ||
| // Update this to match the environment you want to track errors for | ||
| environment: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "production" : "development", | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to the init function.
The initialization could fail silently if environment variables are missing.
init: async () => {
+ if (!process.env.SENTRY_DSN) {
+ throw new Error("SENTRY_DSN environment variable is required");
+ }
Sentry.init({
dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN,
environment: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "production" : "development",
});
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| init: async () => { | |
| Sentry.init({ | |
| // The Data Source Name (DSN) is a unique identifier for your Sentry project. | |
| dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN, | |
| // Update this to match the environment you want to track errors for | |
| environment: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "production" : "development", | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| init: async () => { | |
| if (!process.env.SENTRY_DSN) { | |
| throw new Error("SENTRY_DSN environment variable is required"); | |
| } | |
| Sentry.init({ | |
| // The Data Source Name (DSN) is a unique identifier for your Sentry project. | |
| dsn: process.env.SENTRY_DSN, | |
| // Update this to match the environment you want to track errors for | |
| environment: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production" ? "production" : "development", | |
| }); | |
| }, |
| onFailure: async (payload, error, { ctx }) => { | ||
| Sentry.captureException(error, { | ||
| extra: { | ||
| payload, | ||
| ctx, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in the onFailure handler.
The current implementation might swallow errors. Consider:
- Adding error logging
- Implementing proper error propagation
onFailure: async (payload, error, { ctx }) => {
+ console.error("Task failed:", error);
Sentry.captureException(error, {
extra: {
payload,
ctx,
},
});
+ // Re-throw the error to ensure it's properly propagated
+ throw error;
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| onFailure: async (payload, error, { ctx }) => { | |
| Sentry.captureException(error, { | |
| extra: { | |
| payload, | |
| ctx, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| onFailure: async (payload, error, { ctx }) => { | |
| console.error("Task failed:", error); | |
| Sentry.captureException(error, { | |
| extra: { | |
| payload, | |
| ctx, | |
| }, | |
| }); | |
| // Re-throw the error to ensure it's properly propagated | |
| throw error; | |
| }, | |
| }); |
| ```ts trigger/sentry-error-test.ts | ||
| import { task } from "@trigger.dev/sdk/v3"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const sentryErrorTest = task({ | ||
| id: "sentry-error-test", | ||
| retry: { | ||
| // Only retry once | ||
| maxAttempts: 1, | ||
| }, | ||
| run: async () => { | ||
| const error = new Error("This is a custom error that Sentry will capture"); | ||
| error.cause = { additionalContext: "This is additional context" }; | ||
| throw error; | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Make the test task more realistic and informative.
The current test task is overly simplistic. Consider:
- Adding more realistic error scenarios
- Including structured metadata
- Using Sentry's breadcrumbs feature
export const sentryErrorTest = task({
id: "sentry-error-test",
retry: {
maxAttempts: 1,
},
run: async () => {
+ // Add breadcrumb for better error context
+ Sentry.addBreadcrumb({
+ category: 'task',
+ message: 'Starting sentry test task',
+ level: 'info',
+ });
+
+ // Simulate a more realistic error scenario
+ try {
+ const result = await simulateApiCall();
+ // Process result...
+ } catch (e) {
const error = new Error("This is a custom error that Sentry will capture");
- error.cause = { additionalContext: "This is additional context" };
+ error.cause = {
+ originalError: e,
+ context: {
+ taskId: "sentry-error-test",
+ timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
+ environment: process.env.NODE_ENV,
+ }
+ };
throw error;
+ }
},
});Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation