Skip to content

Retry heartbeat timeouts by putting back in the queue #1689

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

matt-aitken
Copy link
Member

@matt-aitken matt-aitken commented Feb 10, 2025

We use heartbeats to prevent stalled runs from getting stuck forever. If 15 mins passes without a successful heartbeat from the worker for your run, we need to do something about it.

Ordinarily this is a rare issue, but when there is a lot of contention it is more prevalent.

There a few situations where this can happen:

  1. A run is scheduled in the cluster, but for some reason it is never actually picked up and started (networking, no available servers, misc unknown error)
  2. A run is executing and the CPU is pegged at 100%. This is pretty rare given you get 15 mins to respond.

In almost all situations we now put the run back in the queue to retry (it has a maximum number of retries it will do). If it can't be put back in the queue, because it's exceeded the maximum, then we'll fail the run as we do now.

This still isn't ideal because 15 mins have passed from when it should have run, but it does drastically increase the likelihood it will get successfully executed.

In Run Engine 2.0 the heartbeat/stall system has been reworked and we retry start failures much faster.

CleanShot 2025-02-10 at 12 59 40

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced task processing logic to ensure improved handling of requeue and failure scenarios.
    • Refined error and debug messages for clearer feedback during task state transitions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated message handling descriptions to clearly indicate successful or failed operations.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 10, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 30aea1f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Walkthrough

This change introduces a new _count field to the task run query in the TaskRunHeartbeatFailedService, allowing for the counting of attempts associated with task runs. The logic for handling task runs in various states has been modified to include checks for requeuing based on the attempt count. Additionally, error logging messages have been updated to reflect the correct service name, enhancing clarity in logging. The nackMessage method in the MarQS class has been updated to return a boolean indicating the success of message requeuing, improving its functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed... Introduces the _count field to count task run attempts. Modifies the logic for handling task runs in various states to check for requeuing and updates error logging messages to reflect the correct service name.
apps/webapp/app/v3/marqs/index.server.ts Updates the nackMessage method in the MarQS class to return a boolean indicating success. Adjusts return statements and documentation to clarify method behavior.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping by,
New counts to track, oh my!
If no attempts, we requeue with glee,
Else, we log and let it be.
In every hop, code flows divine,
Debug logs and services align!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.45.0

ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bec58eb and 30aea1f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts (3)

52-77: Consider enhancing error messages with attempt information.

The logic for handling PENDING tasks based on attempt count is well-implemented. However, the error message could be more informative by including the attempt count in the failure case.

-              message: "Did not receive a heartbeat from the worker in time",
+              message: `Did not receive a heartbeat from the worker in time (after ${taskRun._count.attempts} attempt${taskRun._count.attempts === 1 ? '' : 's'})`,

54-54: Fix inconsistent service name in logs.

The debug logs refer to "RequeueTaskRunService" but the class is named "TaskRunHeartbeatFailedService". This inconsistency should be fixed.

-            logger.debug("[RequeueTaskRunService] Requeueing task run, there were no attempts.", {
+            logger.debug("[TaskRunHeartbeatFailedService] Requeueing task run, there were no attempts.", {
-              "[RequeueTaskRunService] Failing task run because the heartbeat failed, it's PENDING, locked, and has attempts",
+              "[TaskRunHeartbeatFailedService] Failing task run because the heartbeat failed, it's PENDING, locked, and has attempts",

Also applies to: 61-61


71-75: Consider adding heartbeat timeout duration to error context.

To aid in debugging, consider including the heartbeat timeout duration in the error context. This would help diagnose why runs are timing out.

           error: {
             type: "INTERNAL_ERROR",
             code: TaskRunErrorCodes.TASK_RUN_HEARTBEAT_TIMEOUT,
-            message: "Did not receive a heartbeat from the worker in time",
+            message: "Did not receive a heartbeat from the worker in time",
+            context: {
+              heartbeatTimeoutMinutes: 15, // from PR description
+              lastHeartbeatAt: taskRun.lockedAt,
+            },
           },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bc7d445 and f06e0c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - pnpm)
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (ubuntu-latest - npm)
  • GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: typecheck / typecheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/v3/taskRunHeartbeatFailed.server.ts (1)

33-37: LGTM! Well-structured query modification.

The addition of the _count field to count attempts is clean and follows Prisma conventions.

@matt-aitken matt-aitken changed the title If there’s a heartbeat error and no attempts we put it back in the queue to try again Retry heartbeat timeouts by putting back in the queue Feb 10, 2025
@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit 4dd42cd into main Feb 10, 2025
11 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the heartbeat-retry branch February 10, 2025 13:50
samejr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
* If there’s a heartbeat error and no attempts we put it back in the queue to try again

* When nacking, return whether it was put back in the queue or not

* Try and nack, if it fails then fail the run

* Consolidated switch statement

* Fail executing/retrying runs
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2025
samejr added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2025
* Uses image cards for the frameworks

* Removes old snippets

* New AI agents side menu section

* WIP adding new ai agent pages

* Better overview page

* More copy added to the agent example pages

* Copy improvements

* Removes “Creating a project” page and side menu section

* Fixes broken links

* Updates to the latest Mintlify version, fixes issues, changes theme

* Adds descriptions to the main dropdown menu items

* Reformatted Introduction docs ‘landing page’

* Retry heartbeat timeouts by putting back in the queue (#1689)

* If there’s a heartbeat error and no attempts we put it back in the queue to try again

* When nacking, return whether it was put back in the queue or not

* Try and nack, if it fails then fail the run

* Consolidated switch statement

* Fail executing/retrying runs

* OOM retrying on larger machines (#1691)

* OOM retrying on larger machines

* Create forty-windows-shop.md

* Update forty-windows-shop.md

* Only retry again if the machine is different from the original

* Kubernetes OOMs appear as non-zero sigkills, adding support for treating these as OOMs

* Complete the original attempt span if retrying due to an OOM

* Revert "Complete the original attempt span if retrying due to an OOM"

This reverts commit 5f652c6.

* chore: Update version for release (#1666)

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Release 3.3.14

* Set machine when triggering docs

* Batch queue runs that are waiting for deploy (#1693)

* Detect ffmpeg OOM errors, added manual OutOfMemoryError (#1694)

* Detect ffmpeg OOM errors, added manual OutOfMemoryError

* Create eighty-spies-knock.md

* Improved the machines docs, including the new OutOfMemoryError

* chore: Update version for release (#1695)

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Release 3.3.15

* Create new partitioned TaskEvent table, and switch to it gradually as new runs are created (#1696)

* Create new partitioned TaskEvent table, and switch to it gradually as new runs are created

* Add env var for partition window in seconds

* Make startCreatedAt required in task event store

* Don't create an attempt if the run is final, batchTriggerAndWait bad continue fix (#1698)

* WIP fix for ResumeAttemptService selecting the wrong attempt (which has no error or output)

* Don’t create an attempt if the run is already in a final status

* Don’t get all the columns for the query. Improved the logging.

* Added a log to the batch example

* Filter out the undefined values

* Fix missing logs on child runs by using the root task run createdAt if it exists (#1697)

* Provider changes to support image cache (#1700)

* add env var for additional pull secrets

* make static images configurable

* optional image prefixes

* optional labels with sample rates

* add missing core paths

* remove excessive logs

* Fix run container exits after OOM retries (#1701)

* remove unused imports

* tell run to exit before force requeue

* handle exit for case where we already retried after oom

* improve retry span and add machine props

* don't try to exit run in dev

* Upgrade local dev to use electric beta.15 (#1699)

* Text fixes

* Removed pnpm files

---------

Co-authored-by: Matt Aitken <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eric Allam <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nicktrn <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant