Skip to content

Added links for AOT and tree-shaking #1159

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2017
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/v2/guide/comparison.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Finally, although not as deeply integrated with TypeScript as Angular is, Vue al

In terms of performance, both frameworks are exceptionally fast and there isn't enough data from real world use cases to make a verdict. However if you are determined to see some numbers, Vue 2.0 seems to be ahead of Angular according to this [3rd party benchmark](http://stefankrause.net/js-frameworks-benchmark4/webdriver-ts/table.html).

Recent versions of Angular, with AOT compilation and tree-shaking, have been able to get its size down considerably. However, a full-featured Vue 2 project with Vuex + Vue Router included (~30KB gzipped) is still significantly lighter than an out-of-the-box, AOT-compiled application generated by `angular-cli` (~130KB gzipped).
Recent versions of Angular, with [AOT compilation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahead-of-time_compilation) and [tree-shaking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_shaking), have been able to get its size down considerably. However, a full-featured Vue 2 project with Vuex + Vue Router included (~30KB gzipped) is still significantly lighter than an out-of-the-box, AOT-compiled application generated by `angular-cli` (~130KB gzipped).

### Flexibility

Expand Down