-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
Revive require-sri-for for scripts #129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dcaf2bc
Revive require-sri-for
yoavweiss 150bbe9
Remove style
yoavweiss 396fbf7
Add data and blob exceptions
yoavweiss cd53931
Ignore invalid integrity
yoavweiss 65d18dc
no-cors
yoavweiss 0136269
annevk comments
yoavweiss 486ebe8
integrity-required
yoavweiss File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How likely is it that we expand the list of known tokens? Otherwise a simple string-equals match would suffice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previously the list also included "style". As I don't have a clear use case for it, I didn't add it here.
We could drop this to be a simple equality check now, and expand to a list if/when the time comes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What should the behavior be in user agents which don't understand the new type?
This suggestion would make them not enforce anything at all, which seems suboptimal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is the way CSP directives are currently defined, and that enabled us to expand them over time.
Not enforcing anything on unknown types would enable us to expand the list overtime if needed. What's the alternative you see?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thinking through @annevk's other comment, workers may be a good candidate for near-future expansion of the list.