Skip to content

refactor: supersede entry query by entry dedicated loader #896

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

fi3ework
Copy link
Member

@fi3ework fi3ework commented Apr 2, 2025

Summary

Remove query entry, it's hack and may raise other unexpected issues. Supersede it with an entry dedicated loader, which will only executed for entry module.

Related Links

Checklist

  • Tests updated (or not required).
  • Documentation updated (or not required).

@fi3ework fi3ework force-pushed the remove-entry-query branch from caba130 to 213dd67 Compare April 3, 2025 03:23
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Deploy Preview for rslib ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 213dd67
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/rslib/deploys/67edff19d83e2b0009e9f79e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-896--rslib.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@fi3ework fi3ework force-pushed the remove-entry-query branch from 213dd67 to 22a9356 Compare April 3, 2025 03:33
@fi3ework fi3ework marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 03:50
@fi3ework fi3ework requested a review from Timeless0911 April 3, 2025 03:50
@Timeless0911 Timeless0911 marked this pull request as draft April 3, 2025 07:57
@fi3ework
Copy link
Member Author

fi3ework commented Apr 3, 2025

This PR turns out doesn't resolve multiple entry modules issue which behaves the same as entry query solution when entry module is circular dependented. But this's way better than entry query solution.

@fi3ework fi3ework marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 08:48
@Timeless0911 Timeless0911 merged commit 8dd17b3 into main Apr 3, 2025
14 checks passed
@Timeless0911 Timeless0911 deleted the remove-entry-query branch April 3, 2025 09:01
@fi3ework
Copy link
Member Author

fi3ework commented Apr 3, 2025

#316 is still not resolved in fact (just workaround for now).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants