Explain the relationship between windows-1252, Latin1, and ASCII

encoding.bs

@@ -10,6 +10,18 @@ Markup Shorthands: css off
 Translate IDs: dictdef-textdecoderoptions textdecoderoptions,dictdef-textdecodeoptions textdecodeoptions,index section-index
 </pre>
 
+<pre class=biblio>
+{
+ "ISO8859-1": {
+  "href": "https://www.iso.org/standard/28245.html",
+  "title": "Information technology — 8-bit single-byte coded graphic character sets — Part 1: Latin alphabet No. 1",
+  "publisher": "International Organization for Standardization (ISO)",
+  "status": "Published",
+  "date": "April 1998"
+ }
+}
+</pre>
+
 <link rel=stylesheet href=visualization-colors.css>
 
 
@@ -568,7 +580,10 @@ prescribes, as that is necessary to be compatible with deployed content.
   <tr><td>"<code>windows-1251</code>"
   <tr><td>"<code>x-cp1251</code>"
   <tr>
-   <td rowspan=17><a>windows-1252</a>
+   <td rowspan=17>
+    <a>windows-1252</a>
+    <p class=note>See <a href="#note-latin1-ascii">below</a> for the relationship to historical
+    "Latin1" and "ASCII" concepts.
    <td>"<code>ansi_x3.4-1968</code>"
   <tr><td>"<code>ascii</code>"
   <tr><td>"<code>cp1252</code>"
@@ -732,6 +747,29 @@ part of the ISO 8859 series. In particular, the necessity of the inclusion of <a
 and <a>ISO-8859-16</a> is doubtful for the purpose of supporting existing content, but there are no
 plans to remove these.</p>
 
+<div class=note id=note-latin1-ascii> <p>The <a>windows-1252</a> <a for=/>encoding</a> has various
+<a for=encoding>labels</a>, such as "<code>latin1</code>", "<code>iso-8859-1</code>", and
+"<code>ascii</code>", which have historically been confusing for developers. On the web, and in any
+software that seeks to be web-compatible by implementing this standard, these are synonyms:
+"<code>latin1</code>" and "<code>ascii</code>" are just labels for <a>windows-1252</a>, and any
+software following this standard will, for example, decode 0x80 as U+20AC (€) when asked for the
+"Latin1" or "ASCII" decoding of that byte.
+
+ <p>Software that does not follow this standard does not always give the same answers. The root of
+ this is that the original document that specified Latin1 (ISO/IEC 8859-1) did not provide any
+ mappings for bytes in the inclusive ranges 0x00 to 0x1F or 0x7F to 0x9F. Similarly, the original
+ documents that specified ASCII (ISO/IEC 646, among others) did not provide any mappings for bytes
+ in the inclusive range 0x80 to 0xFF. This means different software has chosen different code point
+ mappings for those bytes when asked to use Latin1 or ASCII encodings. Web browsers and
+ browser-compatible software have chosen to map those bytes according to <a>windows-1252</a>, which
+ is a superset of both, and this choice was codified in this standard. Other software throws errors,
+ or uses <a>isomorphic decoding</a>, or other mappings. [[ISO8859-1]] [[ISO646]]
+
+ <p>As such, implementers and developers need to be careful whenever they are using libraries which
+ expose APIs in terms of "Latin1" or "ASCII". It's very possible such libraries will not give
+ answers in line with this standard, if they have chosen other behaviors for the bytes which were
+ left undefined in the original specifications.
+</div>
 
 <h3 id=output-encodings>Output encodings</h3>
 

tools-label-table.py

@@ -14,7 +14,14 @@ def create_table():
             if label_len > 1:
                 rowspan = " rowspan=" + str(label_len)
 
-            table += "  <tr>\n   <td" + rowspan + "><a>" + encoding["name"] + "</a>"
+            if encoding["name"] != "windows-1252":
+                table += "  <tr><td" + rowspan + ">" + encoding["name"] + "\n"
+            else:
+                table += f"""  <tr>
+   <td{rowspan}>
+    <a>{encoding["name"]}</a>
+    <p class=note>See <a href="#note-latin1-ascii">below</a> for the relationship to historical
+    "Latin1" and "ASCII" concepts."""
             i = 0
             for label in encoding["labels"]:
                 if i > 0: