Skip to content

24-2: Views: throw a human-readable error in case of a missing WITH (security_invoker = true) (#9320) (#9783) #10403

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This is not a real fix, it just masks the problem. View queries are not parsed correctly in the ParseViewQuery function. AST cannot be built in some cases. However, we didn't report AST building error as a failure previously, because we are using only the query text, not the AST. We have fixed the parsing in the other commit (see ydb-platform#9860).
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 14, 2024

2024-10-14 16:32:53 UTC Pre-commit check for 855dd48 has started.
2024-10-14 16:32:56 UTC Build linux-x86_64-release-asan is running...
🟢 2024-10-14 17:34:43 UTC Build successful.
2024-10-14 17:36:35 UTC Tests are running...
🔴 2024-10-14 19:52:26 UTC Some tests failed, follow the links below.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
11083 10957 0 14 67 45

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 14, 2024

2024-10-14 16:34:30 UTC Pre-commit check for 855dd48 has started.
2024-10-14 16:34:33 UTC Build linux-x86_64-relwithdebinfo is running...
🟢 2024-10-14 17:45:57 UTC Build successful.
2024-10-14 17:48:08 UTC Tests are running...
🔴 2024-10-14 20:00:30 UTC Some tests failed, follow the links below.

Test history

TESTS PASSED ERRORS FAILED SKIPPED MUTED?
55449 46055 0 2 9351 41

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 14, 2024

2024-10-14 16:35:07 UTC Pre-commit check for 855dd48 has started.
2024-10-14 16:35:09 UTC Build linux-x86_64-release-clang14 is running...
🟢 2024-10-14 17:50:47 UTC Build successful.

@jepett0 jepett0 marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 05:46
@jepett0 jepett0 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 15, 2024 05:46
@jepett0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jepett0 commented Nov 5, 2024

These improvements are not needed in the target branch, because the customers have already moved to a version of YDB built from a more recent branch.

@jepett0 jepett0 closed this Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants