Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove s390x-linux-gnu assembler workarounds with LLVM 20 #21329

Closed
Tracked by #22014
alexrp opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #22014

Remove s390x-linux-gnu assembler workarounds with LLVM 20 #21329

alexrp opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
arch-s390x 64-bit IBM z/Architecture backend-llvm The LLVM backend outputs an LLVM IR Module. bug Observed behavior contradicts documented or intended behavior upstream An issue with a third party project that Zig uses.
Milestone
0.15.0

Comments

@alexrp
Copy link
Member

alexrp commented Sep 7, 2024

See: #21313
@alexrp alexrp self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
@alexrp alexrp added upstream An issue with a third party project that Zig uses. zig cc Zig as a drop-in C compiler feature labels Oct 3, 2024
@alexrp alexrp added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Oct 3, 2024
@alexrp alexrp added bug Observed behavior contradicts documented or intended behavior arch-s390x 64-bit IBM z/Architecture backend-llvm The LLVM backend outputs an LLVM IR Module. and removed zig cc Zig as a drop-in C compiler feature labels Oct 3, 2024
@alexrp alexrp mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2024
Closed
14 tasks
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
ecafed1 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
7400e2c 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
6215db9 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
7d6ea04 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
ea73233 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 2, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
a3d2b5c 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
a58125c 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
71ac69f 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
48f3f8e 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
alexrp added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 3, 2025
@alexrp
Revert "glibc: Patch to work around missing features in LLVM's s390x …
7a1ab7d 
…assembler."

This reverts commit b230e4f.

Closes #21329.
@alexrp alexrp removed their assignment Apr 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
arch-s390x 64-bit IBM z/Architecture backend-llvm The LLVM backend outputs an LLVM IR Module. bug Observed behavior contradicts documented or intended behavior upstream An issue with a third party project that Zig uses.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.15.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@alexrp