feature: Per course status page

[yammesicka]

Also, lots of small improvements:

• Hebrew strings fixes
• Removing cluttered suggestions from views.py
• Better migration setup - create tables that doesn't exist first
• Tests for the status page

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #348 (9467f84) into master (a787de9) will increase coverage by 0.10%.
The diff coverage is 44.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #348      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.08%   84.18%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        2946     2953       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         2477     2486       +9     
+ Misses        469      467       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lms/models/solutions.py	98.97% <ø> (ø)
lms/lmsdb/bootstrap.py	16.45% <18.75%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
lms/lmsweb/views.py	92.93% <80.00%> (-0.19%)	⬇️
lms/lmsdb/models.py	91.95% <100.00%> (+0.87%)	⬆️
lms/models/comments.py	80.39% <0.00%> (-1.97%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a787de9...9467f84. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.23%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	2.36 ⭐	2.25 ⭐	-0.11 👍
Method Length	39.59 ⭐	39.27 ⭐	-0.32 👍
Working memory	6.80 🙂	6.84 🙂	0.04 👎
Quality	79.63% ⭐	79.86% ⭐	0.23% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	2000	2012	12

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
lms/lmsdb/bootstrap.py	79.77% ⭐	81.17% ⭐	1.40% 👍
lms/lmsdb/models.py	84.48% ⭐	84.12% ⭐	-0.36% 👎
lms/lmsweb/views.py	75.31% ⭐	75.40% ⭐	0.09% 👍
lms/models/solutions.py	74.82% 🙂	75.04% ⭐	0.22% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
lms/lmsweb/views.py	comment	13 🙂	202 😞	8 🙂	50.15% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
lms/lmsdb/models.py	Solution.status	1 ⭐	118 🙂	17 ⛔	55.65% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
lms/lmsweb/views.py	view	8 ⭐	140 😞	10 😞	56.16% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
lms/lmsweb/views.py	login	5 ⭐	129 😞	12 😞	56.69% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
lms/models/solutions.py	get_view_parameters	5 ⭐	128 😞	12 😞	56.81% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!