Skip to content

chore: Generated code for commit ad260df53c07cb46ed4353735159d1778a480a63. #303

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 28, 2022

Conversation

shortcuts
Copy link
Member

Co-authored-by: Clément Vannicatte [email protected]

🧭 What and Why

🎟 JIRA Ticket: -

Changes included:

🧪 Test

CI :D

Co-authored-by: Clément Vannicatte <[email protected]>
@shortcuts shortcuts requested a review from a team March 28, 2022 14:49
@shortcuts shortcuts self-assigned this Mar 28, 2022
@shortcuts shortcuts requested review from eunjae-lee and damcou and removed request for a team March 28, 2022 14:49
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 28, 2022

Deploy Preview for api-clients-automation ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c08b1ad
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/api-clients-automation/deploys/6241cb14657ea500087a1855
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-303--api-clients-automation.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@shortcuts shortcuts changed the title Generated code for commit ad260df53c07cb46ed4353735159d1778a480a63. chore: Generated code for commit ad260df53c07cb46ed4353735159d1778a480a63. Mar 28, 2022
@shortcuts shortcuts enabled auto-merge (squash) March 28, 2022 14:50
@algolia-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

algolia-bot commented Mar 28, 2022

✗ The generated branch has been deleted.

If the PR has been merged, you can check the generated code on the generated/main branch.

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ components:
period to analyze.
schema:
type: string
example: 1999-09-19T00:00:00.000Z
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the pattern doesn't reflect the example anymore, the bundler changed ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it was one of the motivation of #300, the new output is better

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the algolia API work with this format ? the doc only have simple date as example

Copy link
Member Author

@shortcuts shortcuts Mar 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This issue was only present on the Documentation and bundled specs, generators does not take example into account

does the algolia API work with this format ?

no

Copy link
Collaborator

@millotp millotp Mar 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay so now the doc is misleading, I don't get this change
I'm stupid I read the diff backward

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How come?

The example we defined was 1999-09-19, but the bundler outputted 1999-09-19T00:00:00.000Z, the bundle update in #300 fixed that

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm stupid I read the diff backward

Ah XD

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants