-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
chore: add @__PURE__
annotation to ES5 output for uglify
#4147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
|
||
const iifeExpression = | ||
new RegExp('^(var (\\S+) = )(\\(function \\(\\) \\{\\n(?: ' + | ||
'(?:\\/\\*\\*| \\*|\\*\\/|\\/\\/)[^\\n]*\\n)* function \\2\\([^\\)]*\\) \\{\\n)', 'mg'); | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Adds `@__PURE__` annotation comments to IIFEs containing ES5-downleveled classes generated by | ||
* TypeScript so that Uglify can tree-shake classes that are not referenced. | ||
* | ||
* @param fileContent The content of the file for which `@__PURE__` will be added. | ||
* @returns The content of the file with `@__PURE__` annotations added. | ||
*/ | ||
export function addPureAnnotations(fileContent: string) { | ||
return fileContent | ||
// Prefix downleveled classes w/ the @__PURE__ annotation. | ||
.replace(iifeExpression, '$1/*@__PURE__*/$3') | ||
// Prefix downleveled classes that extend another class w/ the @__PURE__ annotation | ||
.replace( | ||
/^(var (\S+) = )(\(function \(_super\) \{\n __extends\(\2, _super\);\n)/mg, | ||
'$1/*@__PURE__*/$3' | ||
); | ||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we move that RegExp to a constant as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only moved the first one because it's over 100 characters long and needed to be wrapped in a string.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine by me. Just think that it would be more clean if you have it like a stream (just running transformers)
But since its mostly temporary.. doesn't matter.