Fix error in TS client packages with '--isolatedModules':

[haggholm]

error TS2748: Cannot access ambient const enums when the '--isolatedModules' flag is provided.

[charmander]

Assuming this is an error you get when trying to use values of MessageName in your code and not just when you import pg, it looks like you could fix this by specifying a string literal instead?

[haggholm]

Assuming this is an error you get when trying to use values of MessageName in your code and not just when you import pg…

Unfortunately, that’s not an accurate assumption: our code doesn’t import MessageName at all. I suppose that’s triggered by library type checks with --isolatedModules.

[ujwal-setlur]

Would love to see this merged. @types/pg is breaking with --isolatedModules set:

DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped#51183

[bart-opplane]

#2481

[rudi-c]

+1 we've run into this too

[charmander]

Is this fixable by using string literals in pg-protocol, then? A non-const enum seems less than ideal here.

[Bartmr]

@charmander why not? It's just type declarations. The final value will always be one of those strings

[brianc]

Sorry I missed this for a while, had some personal stuff to deal with. This looks good, and this also looks good...I'll take a look at both today & get one merged & released. I only need const enum in 1 place because that enum gets inlined into the switch statement in the hot path of the parser. Everywhere else I don't need const enum - particularly on exported types. I'm pretty sure I just put the const in that other place out of habit.

[brianc]

I just merged this: #2490

This should fix the issue, yeah? LMK if that looks good & I can release a new version w/ the change.

[brianc]

hmmm thinking about it do you think the other way is gonna break any backwards compatibility? If those MessageName enums are used somewhere then changing them to a string literal is not gonna work. OTOH if they were never exportable to begin with because they were const enum then there's no risk of anyone having already used them?

[charmander]

@charmander why not? It's just type declarations. The final value will always be one of those strings

Exactly, it’s redundant.

[forivall]

Considering that the MessageName const enum was never a top level export, I think it can be considered to be implementation internal details, so anyone directly using it would be accepting that breakage risk.

[brianc]

Considering that the MessageName const enum was never a top level export, I think it can be considered to be implementation internal details, so anyone directly using it would be accepting that breakage risk.

okay awesome i'll keep it how it is then & get a new version pushed up today/tomorrow...thanks for your help & feedback & sorry for the delay!

[davidje13]

@brianc did you manage to get a version pushed with this fix? I'm still seeing the problem after rebuilding my node_modules / package-lock.json (so it should be latest versions of everything):

node_modules/pg-protocol/dist/messages.d.ts:86:21 - error TS2748: Cannot access ambient const enums when the '--isolatedModules' flag is provided.

86     readonly name = MessageName.copyData;

[brianc]

did you manage to get a version pushed with this fix? I'm still seeing the problem after rebuilding my node_modules / package-lock.json (so it should be latest versions of everything):

sorry - doing that right now!

[brianc]

sorry for the delay

Successfully published:
 - [email protected]
 - [email protected]
 - [email protected]
 - [email protected]
 - [email protected]
 - [email protected]

published w/ the fix - finally!

Please lmk if you still have problems & thanks for the input & help here. ❤️

[bart-opplane]

@brianc The problem still persists. @types/pg still has the old versions of pg-protocol and others

[davidje13]

@bart-opplane I cleared my package-lock.json and it brought in the latest version with the fix. It might be good for @types/pg to force the new version, but because it's a version range it will already pick it up if you don't have an old version locked.

[bart-opplane]

@davidje13 You're right. But not just package-lock.json

Deleting node_modules, package-lock.json and the file generated by Typescript's incremental compilation all together solves the issue.