-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
[Fix #537] Fail early in cljr-rename-symbol if narrowing is in effect #538
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I tried to add a test, but
even when executed in the master branch, so I had no way of knowing whether my test would have actually worked. Is this expected? Or am I misinterpreting the output? Nevertheless thanks a lot for your work on this project. ❤️ After working with IntellIJ IDEA for quite some time now, I’ve really grown fond of its refactoring capabilities, so |
Thanks much! I'll check what's going on with CI as soon as I have the chance. |
Won't it be better to just ignore the narrowing instead? |
As I said in #537: that would also be my preferred option. But I’m of course in no position to decide whether that’s the way forward. |
… is in effect Previously the function would report a successful renaming without actually having renamed anything.
Otherwise the linter will complain about the "if" missing its "else" branch.
6597a2e
to
456b8aa
Compare
This commit is into the 3.7.0 release and will be visible in MELPA/etc within a couple hours. Thanks! |
Previously the function would report a successful renaming without actually having renamed anything (see #537).