Update op-challenger.mdx #1036
Update op-challenger.mdx #1036
Conversation
There have been more recent releases of the op-challenger. Lets just link directly to the release page.
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the documentation for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (3)
Line range hint
22-150: Fix capitalization and formatting inconsistenciesSeveral formatting and capitalization issues need to be addressed:
- Standardize the capitalization of "SafeDB" throughout the document
- Add Oxford commas in lists (e.g., "op-node, batcher, and proposer")
- Capitalize technical terms consistently (e.g., "Docker", "JSON")
- Format code blocks consistently with proper syntax highlighting
Example fixes:
- safedb.path + SafeDB.path - op-node, batcher and proposer + op-node, batcher, and proposer - json or url + JSON or URL
Line range hint
151-200: Improve technical writing stylePlease address the following style issues:
- Replace personal pronouns with proper nouns
- Use consistent backticks for command names
- Capitalize "Docker" properly
Apply these changes:
- you must specify + chain operators must specify - if you experience any problems + if any problems occur - docker image + Docker image
Line range hint
201-250: Fix table formatting and proper noun capitalizationPlease address the following issues:
- Add periods at the end of each table description for consistency
- Capitalize "Grafana" properly
- Use consistent formatting for file references
Example fixes:
- grafana dashboard + Grafana dashboard - Creates a dispute game via the factory + Creates a dispute game via the factory.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1)
Pattern
**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for headers, buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- Use sentence case for H1, H2, and H3 headers, capitalizing only the first word and any proper nouns.
- For all headers (H1, H2, H3), do not change the capitalization of proper nouns; keep them as they are.
"
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1)
22-22: LGTM: Release link update improves maintainabilityThe change to link to the releases page instead of a specific version is a good improvement that will help keep the documentation current.
There have been more recent releases of the op-challenger. Lets just link directly to the release page so this doesn't fall out of date as often.