Skip to content

Deploy assets using Superchain ERC20 #1050

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bradleycamacho
Copy link
Member

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho commented Oct 30, 2024

Closes https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/devrel/issues/381

This doc explains how to deploy assests using the SuperchainERC20 standard.

The issue had minimal collateral, so there may be pieces missing; especially regarding code examples and how we want to message this as a company. I've left various comments where I think specific review is needed.

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 21:25
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 18cd436
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/672d5f2adac3d600081ace7b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1050--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho marked this pull request as draft October 30, 2024 21:31
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@bradleycamacho has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df0e197 and 18cd436.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request include the addition of a new key-value pair in the JSON metadata file for SuperchainERC20 and the creation of a new documentation file detailing the deployment process for assets using the SuperchainERC20 standard. Additionally, the existing SuperchainERC20 documentation has been updated to include links to the new guide and a warning about interoperability requirements with the SuperchainERC20Bridge.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json Added new entry: "deploy-superchain-erc20": "Deploy assets using SuperchainERC20"
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx Created new guide on deploying assets using SuperchainERC20, detailing contract deployment and bridging.
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx Updated to include a link to the new deployment guide and added a warning about access to the SuperchainERC20Bridge.

Possibly related PRs

  • interop explainers #825: This PR introduces interop explainers that enhance documentation related to interoperability, which is directly relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding the SuperchainERC20 functionality.
  • superchainERC20 #986: This PR adds a new entry for the SuperchainERC20 token standard in the metadata, which aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing the metadata for SuperchainERC20.
  • Add linked to SuperchainERC20 #1010: This PR adds a link to the SuperchainERC20 documentation in the interoperability explainer, directly connecting to the main PR's changes regarding the SuperchainERC20.
  • superchain-weth #1043: This PR introduces a new page for SuperchainWETH, which is related to the interoperability features discussed in the main PR, particularly in the context of asset transfers.
  • How to transfer a SuperchainERC20 #1048: This PR provides guidance on transferring SuperchainERC20 tokens, which is directly related to the main PR's focus on the SuperchainERC20 functionality.
  • Clarify SuperchainERC20 supply considerations #1051: This PR clarifies that the supply of assets remains unaffected when moving across the Superchain, which is relevant to the operational mechanics of the SuperchainERC20 discussed in the main PR.

Suggested labels

documentation, flag:merge-pending-release

Suggested reviewers

  • zainbacchus
  • cpengilly
  • sbvegan

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (2)

1-5: Enhance the description metadata.

The current description is somewhat redundant with the title. Consider making it more specific about what readers will learn.

-description: Learn about the basic details of deploying assets on SuperchainERC20
+description: Learn how to deploy and bridge tokens using the SuperchainERC20 standard across multiple chains

90-93: Enhance link descriptions in the next steps section.

Make the links more descriptive to better indicate what readers will learn.

 ## Next steps
-*   Explore the [SuperchainERC20 specifications](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/token-bridging.html) for in-depth implementation details.
-*   Watch the [Superchain interop design video walkthrough](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes) for a visual explanation of the concepts.
-*   Review the [Superchain Interop Explainer](explainer) for answers to common questions about interoperability.
+*   Learn about token bridging protocols in the [SuperchainERC20 technical specifications](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/token-bridging.html).
+*   Understand the architecture through our [30-minute video walkthrough of Superchain interop design](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
+*   Get answers to frequently asked questions in the [Superchain Interop Explainer](explainer).
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (2)

Line range hint 1-24: Documentation style improvements needed

Please make the following adjustments to align with the documentation guidelines:

  1. Header case:

    • Change "How it works" to "How it works"
    • Change "Major components" to "Major components"
    • Change "Implementation details" to "Implementation details"
    • Change "Next steps" to "Next steps"
  2. Replace personal pronouns:

    • "their tokens" could be replaced with "the tokens"
  3. Technical term capitalization:

    • Ensure consistent capitalization of "Superchain", "SuperchainERC20", and "Interop" throughout the document

Also applies to: 82-83


82-83: Improve sentence structure in the new link section

The current sentence could be more direct and clearer. Consider revising to:

-For step-by-step information on implementing SuperchainERC20, see [Deploy assets using SuperchainERC20](/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20)
+For step-by-step implementation instructions, see [Deploy assets using SuperchainERC20](/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20).

The revision:

  • Makes the sentence more concise
  • Adds missing period
  • Removes redundant mention of "SuperchainERC20" since it's clear from context
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8131990 and d7e9154.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx

[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...he SuperchainERC20Bridge. If you want more information about the SuperchainERC20 standard, s...

(MORE_INFO)


[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...t methods, such as: * Create2Deployer: A smart contract that enables deploying...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...sses. * OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory: A factory contract designed for L1-nati...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[grammar] ~59-~59: After the number ‘two’, use a plural noun. Did you mean “functions”?
Context: ...nal message information. We'll use two function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializ...

(CD_NNU)


[uncategorized] ~61-~61: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...wo function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializes a cross-chain transfer of a...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[misspelling] ~61-~61: Although “in regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...t does not "create" an additional asset in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incomin...

(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)


[uncategorized] ~62-~62: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...set in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incoming messages from the L2to...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx

[warning] 28-28:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 29-29:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 61-61:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 62-62:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1)

5-6: LGTM! The metadata entry is well-structured.

The new entry follows the existing naming conventions and is logically placed after the related SuperchainERC20 documentation entry.

Let's verify the existence of the referenced documentation file:

✅ Verification successful

Documentation file exists and matches the metadata entry

The deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx file is present in the expected location at pages/stack/interop/, confirming that the metadata entry correctly references an existing documentation file.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the corresponding documentation file exists
fd --type f "deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx" pages/stack/interop/

Length of output: 110

@bradleycamacho
Copy link
Member Author

@zainbacchus this is ready for your review whenever you have a second!

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 16:05
@bradleycamacho
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @zainbacchus! Reminder this needs a review if we wanna go live by DevCon

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (4)

4-4: Enhance the description to be more specific.

The current description is too generic. Consider revising to better reflect the guide's purpose.

-description: Learn about the basic details of deploying assets on SuperchainERC20
+description: Learn how to deploy and bridge assets across chains using the SuperchainERC20 standard

28-29: Fix list item indentation.

The markdown list items need proper indentation for consistent formatting.

-* `Create2Deployer`: A smart contract that enables deploying contracts with predictable addresses.
-* `OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory`: A factory contract designed for L1-native tokens to ensure uniform deployments across chains.
+  * `Create2Deployer`: A smart contract that enables deploying contracts with predictable addresses.
+  * `OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory`: A factory contract designed for L1-native tokens to ensure uniform deployments across chains.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...t methods, such as: * Create2Deployer: A smart contract that enables deploying...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...sses. * OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory: A factory contract designed for L1-nati...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 28-28:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 29-29:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


46-53: Enhance interface documentation with NatSpec comments.

The interface should include comprehensive documentation for better developer understanding.

 interface ICrosschainERC20 {
+    /// @notice Mints tokens to an account. Only callable by the authorized bridge.
+    /// @param _account The address to mint tokens to
+    /// @param _amount The amount of tokens to mint
     function crosschainMint(address _account, uint256 _amount) external;
 
+    /// @notice Burns tokens from an account. Only callable by the authorized bridge.
+    /// @param _account The address to burn tokens from
+    /// @param _amount The amount of tokens to burn
     function crosschainBurn(address _account, uint256 _amount) external;
 
+    /// @notice Emitted when tokens are minted through cross-chain transfer
+    /// @param _to The address receiving the tokens
+    /// @param _amount The amount of tokens minted
     event CrosschainMint(address indexed _to, uint256 _amount);
+
+    /// @notice Emitted when tokens are burned for cross-chain transfer
+    /// @param _from The address tokens are burned from
+    /// @param _amount The amount of tokens burned
     event CrosschainBurn(address indexed _from, uint256 _amount);
 }

59-59: Fix grammatical error.

-We'll use two function for bridging:
+We'll use two functions for bridging:
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~59-~59: After the number ‘two’, use a plural noun. Did you mean “functions”?
Context: ...nal message information. We'll use two function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializ...

(CD_NNU)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7e9154 and 79a3924.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx

[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...he SuperchainERC20Bridge. If you want more information about the SuperchainERC20 standard, s...

(MORE_INFO)


[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...t methods, such as: * Create2Deployer: A smart contract that enables deploying...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...sses. * OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory: A factory contract designed for L1-nati...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[grammar] ~59-~59: After the number ‘two’, use a plural noun. Did you mean “functions”?
Context: ...nal message information. We'll use two function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializ...

(CD_NNU)


[uncategorized] ~61-~61: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...wo function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializes a cross-chain transfer of a...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[misspelling] ~61-~61: Although “in regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...t does not "create" an additional asset in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incomin...

(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)


[uncategorized] ~62-~62: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...set in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incoming messages from the L2to...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx

[warning] 18-18:
Blocked character found: (’) at index 165


[warning] 28-28:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 29-29:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 61-61:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 62-62:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

67-87: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add essential security checks to bridge functions.

The implementation should include proper validation to ensure secure token transfers.

 function sendERC20(SuperchainERC20 _token, address _to, uint256 _amount, uint256 _chainId) external returns (bytes32 msgHash_) {
+    require(_to != address(0), "Invalid recipient");
+    require(_amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");
+    require(_chainId != block.chainid, "Cannot bridge to same chain");
+
     _token.crosschainBurn(msg.sender, _amount);
 
     bytes memory _message = abi.encodeCall(this.relayERC20, (_token, msg.sender, _to, _amount));
 
     msgHash_ = L2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger.sendMessage(_chainId, address(this), _message);
     
     emit SentERC20(address(_token), msg.sender, _to, _amount, _chainId);
 }
 
 function relayERC20(SuperchainERC20 _token, address _from, address _to, uint256 _amount) external {
-    require(msg.sender == address(L2ToL2CrossChainMessenger));
-    require(L2ToL2CrossChainMessenger.crossDomainMessageSender() == address(this));
+    require(msg.sender == address(L2ToL2CrossChainMessenger), "Unauthorized messenger");
+    require(L2ToL2CrossChainMessenger.crossDomainMessageSender() == address(this), "Unauthorized sender");
+    require(_to != address(0), "Invalid recipient");
+    require(_amount > 0, "Amount must be positive");
     
     uint256 _source = L2ToL2CrossChainMessenger.crossDomainMessageSource();
 
     _token.crosschainMint(_to, _amount);
 
     emit RelayedERC20(address(_token), _from, _to, _amount, _source);
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@zainbacchus
Copy link
Contributor

General feedback, for any code pls point the user to the relevant specs section https://specs.optimism.io/interop/token-bridging.html#implementation

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (2)

1-5: Enhance the description to be more specific.

The current description is somewhat redundant with the title. Consider revising it to better describe the guide's contents:

-description: Learn about the basic details of deploying assets on SuperchainERC20
+description: Step-by-step guide for deploying and bridging assets using SuperchainERC20 across the Superchain

16-16: Use more formal language in documentation.

Consider revising the sentence to use a more formal tone:

-If you want more information about the `SuperchainERC20 standard`, see our [`SuperchainERC20` standard explainer](/stack/interop/superchain-erc20)
+For more information about the `SuperchainERC20`, refer to the [`SuperchainERC20` explainer](/stack/interop/superchain-erc20)
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...he SuperchainERC20Bridge. If you want more information about the SuperchainERC20 standard, s...

(MORE_INFO)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79a3924 and df0e197.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx

[style] ~16-~16: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...he SuperchainERC20Bridge. If you want more information about the SuperchainERC20 standard, s...

(MORE_INFO)


[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...t methods, such as: * Create2Deployer: A smart contract that enables deploying...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~29-~29: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...sses. * OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory: A factory contract designed for L1-nati...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[grammar] ~39-~39: After the number ‘two’, use a plural noun. Did you mean “functions”?
Context: ...unctions and two events. We'll use two function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializ...

(CD_NNU)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...wo function for bridging: * sendERC20: initializes a cross-chain transfer of a...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[misspelling] ~41-~41: Although “in regards to” is sometimes used in casual speech, it is typically considered a nonstandard phrase.
Context: ...t does not "create" an additional asset in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incomin...

(IN_OR_WITH_REGARDS_TO_OF)


[uncategorized] ~42-~42: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...set in regards to supply. * relayERC20: process incoming messages from the L2to...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx (2)

10-14: LGTM!

The title follows sentence case guidelines, and the callout effectively communicates the development status.


48-51: LGTM!

The next steps section provides clear guidance with appropriate resources.

Copy link
Contributor

@zainbacchus zainbacchus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho merged commit f29e271 into main Nov 8, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho deleted the SERC20-deploy-assets branch November 8, 2024 00:53
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants