-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
rev 1-2-1 a 1-2-5 #342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
joaquinelio
merged 5 commits into
javascript-tutorial:master
from
joaquinelio:revirepo1
Aug 24, 2020
Merged
rev 1-2-1 a 1-2-5 #342
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2402401
rev 1-2-1 a 1-2-5
joaquinelio b3e68a2
Update 1-js/02-first-steps/03-strict-mode/article.md
joaquinelio 8a92149
Update 1-js/02-first-steps/03-strict-mode/article.md
joaquinelio 2379b38
Update article.md
joaquinelio 3c673a3
Update article.md
joaquinelio File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
me parece correcto el uso de compatible en el contexto de Computación..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitivamente no.
Siempre que puedo uso compatibilidad, porque suena menos tosco.
Pero soporte se aplica tanto a compatibilidad (uno soporta al otro)
como a que tiene o no una habilidad.
Compatibilidad se refiere a paridad,
por ejemplo Stephen Hawking para que pueda hablar lo hicieron compatible IBM,
uno de incompatibilidad correntinos y chaqueños o porteños y salteños, o porteños y todo lo demás.
Pero el artículo no es mío ni lo traduje, así que si no te convencí lo devuelvo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No entiendo tus argumentos.
Obstinado en hacer las cosas a tu manera. Me pregunto para qué existen los Diccionarios??
https://www.wordreference.com/es/translation.asp?tranword=support
que tal así :
¡No se admiten comentarios anidados!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@EzequielCaste
¿Obstinado? Mirá quien habla.
Y tuve que aflojar en casi todo con tal de que el repo avanzara.
Soporta... o aguanta. ¡Aguanten los comentarios anidados!
El argumento es claro pero fallé en escribirlo, me comi un par de palabras.
"Compatibilidad" no sirve en este caso. COMPA es soporte entre dos entidades maomeno pares, esto "No da soporte" a la anidación, no podés decir que no es compatible con ella.
Puedo decir que esta jarra admite/permite/soporta cocción, no que es compatible con la cocción.
Tu reference a wordreference, refuerza mi argumento: que no siempre se traduce igual.
ahí dice support = soportar / respaldar, y "compatible" lo usa solo en "SO" <=> "MediaPlayer",
para TODO lo demas usa "permite" o "soporta".
En lo posible no traduzco,
El diccionario que uso son DLE y DPD de la Real Academia Española, y Fundeu que no es perfecto pero aguanta (y me ayudaron con una particularmente dificil).
para ingles pregunto la definicion en inglés a google, no recuerdo de donde la saca.
Y... ya lo habia puesto asi, pense que por eso lo aprobaste, lo habias sugerido en otro lado. Admitir es mejor que soportar y MUCHO mejor que compatible.
Ahora me gusta más "no permite comentario anidados" pero ni pieno cambiarlo.
Vi el coment de casualidad, no se si lo leeras...