Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add README.md file to the epp pkg #386

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

@ahg-g ahg-g commented Feb 21, 2025

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 21, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Deploy Preview for gateway-api-inference-extension ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fa4a77d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/gateway-api-inference-extension/deploys/67b8ea6c7853ef00084fb04f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-386--gateway-api-inference-extension.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 21, 2025
@ahg-g ahg-g changed the title [WIP] Polish the epp README.md file Polish the epp README.md file Feb 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 21, 2025
@ahg-g ahg-g changed the title Polish the epp README.md file Add README.md file to the epp pkg Feb 21, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# The EndPoint Picker (EPP)
This package provides the reference implementation for the Endpoint Picker (EPP). It implements the [extension protocol](../../docs/proposals/003-endpoint-picker-protocol), enabling a proxy or gateway to request endpoint hints from an extension. As it is implemented now, an EPP instance handles a single `InferencePool` (and so for each `InferencePool`, one must create a dedicated EPP deployment).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Consider dropping 'As it is implemented now'. My thinking is: we can just update this when/if we make an EPP multitenant

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sense, done.


- Endpoint Selection
- The EPP determines the appropriate Pod endpoint for the load balancer (LB) to route requests.
- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool.
- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool's [Selector](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gateway-api-inference-extension/blob/7e3cd457cdcd01339b65861c8e472cf27e6b6e80/api/v1alpha1/inferencepool_types.go#L53) field.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is also a nit

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool.
- Endpoint selection is contingent on the request's ModelName matching an `InferenceModel` that references the `InferencePool`.
- Requests with unmatched ModelName values trigger an error response to the proxy.
- The endpoint selection algorithm is detailed below.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: consider removing, the headers I think are prominent enough to draw attention.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

- Requests with unmatched ModelName values trigger an error response to the proxy.
- The endpoint selection algorithm is detailed below.
- Traffic Splitting and ModelName Rewriting
- The EPP facilitates controlled rollouts of new adapter versions by implementing traffic splitting between adapters within the same `InferencePool`, as defined by the `InferenceModel`.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More nits: Linking to the InfModel's targetmodel field could be useful

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@kfswain
Copy link
Collaborator

kfswain commented Feb 21, 2025

This all looks great! Left some comments, but these are true nits, feel free to disregard. This is already a major improvement from what we had before. Thanks!

/lgtm
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2025
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ahg-g ahg-g left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the detailed review, addressed all comments

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# The EndPoint Picker (EPP)
This package provides the reference implementation for the Endpoint Picker (EPP). It implements the [extension protocol](../../docs/proposals/003-endpoint-picker-protocol), enabling a proxy or gateway to request endpoint hints from an extension. As it is implemented now, an EPP instance handles a single `InferencePool` (and so for each `InferencePool`, one must create a dedicated EPP deployment).
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

make sense, done.


- Endpoint Selection
- The EPP determines the appropriate Pod endpoint for the load balancer (LB) to route requests.
- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

- It selects from the pool of ready Pods designated by the assigned InferencePool.
- Endpoint selection is contingent on the request's ModelName matching an `InferenceModel` that references the `InferencePool`.
- Requests with unmatched ModelName values trigger an error response to the proxy.
- The endpoint selection algorithm is detailed below.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

- Requests with unmatched ModelName values trigger an error response to the proxy.
- The endpoint selection algorithm is detailed below.
- Traffic Splitting and ModelName Rewriting
- The EPP facilitates controlled rollouts of new adapter versions by implementing traffic splitting between adapters within the same `InferencePool`, as defined by the `InferenceModel`.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 21, 2025
@kfswain
Copy link
Collaborator

kfswain commented Feb 21, 2025

/lgtm

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2025
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor Author

ahg-g commented Feb 21, 2025

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 21, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9bd136a into kubernetes-sigs:main Feb 21, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
kaushikmitr pushed a commit to kaushikmitr/llm-instance-gateway that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
* Polish the epp README.md file

* Addressed comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants