-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 370
MON-2212: Expose the /federate endpoint of UWM Prometheus as a service #1601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MON-2212: Expose the /federate endpoint of UWM Prometheus as a service #1601
Conversation
e245913
to
3edadfd
Compare
3edadfd
to
06fff51
Compare
/retest |
/test |
@arajkumar: The
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/test all |
1 similar comment
/test all |
06fff51
to
3dbee1d
Compare
/retest |
3dbee1d
to
e190bbe
Compare
Procedure to test
|
/retest |
/retest Ping @juzhao for qe approval. |
68b95f4
to
a7bd931
Compare
Is it possible to share the same port & kube-rbac-proxy for metric and federate endpoints?
"authorization":
"resourceAttributes":
"apiVersion": "v1"
"resource": "namespaces"
"verb": "get"
"static":
- "path": "/metrics"
"resourceRequest": false
"user":
"name": "system:serviceaccount:openshift-monitoring:prometheus-k8s"
"verb": "get"
|
I don't think this would be good choice as the nature of access will be totally different. @simonpasquier @jan--f need you input on this. Thanks. |
Yes I agree with you @arajkumar. No user should be interested in the metrics the UWM prometheus exports. |
a7bd931
to
f380a2a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
switch container.Name { | ||
case "kube-rbac-proxy-metrics", "kube-rbac-proxy-federate", "kube-rbac-proxy-thanos": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice :)
@lihongyan1 please help to review |
Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
f380a2a
to
f1863aa
Compare
Ping @Senthamilarasu-STA (for px-approval) |
/label px-approved |
@arajkumar: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label qe-approved |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: arajkumar, jan--f The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]>
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b647559)
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b647559)
Successor of openshift#1601 to expose UWM federate service as a Openshift Route. Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit b647559)
Signed-off-by: Arunprasad Rajkumar [email protected]