-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
OADP-5901: Add design for DataProtectionTest CRD and Controller #1706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OADP-5901: Add design for DataProtectionTest CRD and Controller #1706
Conversation
@shubham-pampattiwar: This pull request references OADP-5901 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, almost there :)
docs/design/data-protection-test.md
Outdated
metadata: | ||
name: my-data-protection-test | ||
spec: | ||
backupLocation: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it make sense to also have spec.bslName
-- validate that only one of bslName
and backupLocation
can be present -- that way if the BSL is already defined in the cluster, they don't need to copy all of that metadata over -- they can just reference the BSL by name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, yeah we can do that, optional name, but then it would be either the BSLConfig or the BSLName, not both.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, added a note and updated DPT CRD.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/LGTM /approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: shubham-pampattiwar, sseago, weshayutin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@shubham-pampattiwar: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
lgtm isn't working.. manual label |
a772aaf
into
openshift:master
Why the changes were made
Design for DPT CRD and controller
How to test the changes made
Review the design